Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Olivares”
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before CRISFIELD, GERRITY, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Antonio OLIVARES III Sonar Technician (Surface) Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Antonio OLIVARES Sonar Technician (Surface) Second Class Petty Officer (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellee No. 201800125 Appeal by the United States pursuant to Article 62, UCMJ
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Juan Olivares appeals from the sentence the District Court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His written plea agreement included an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with Anders *571v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that th
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Alberto Olivares raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Nor is knowledge of drug type and quantity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C.
United States v. Olivares-Estradapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Olivares-Estrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Olivares-Estrada has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
United States v. Olivares-Pachecopublic domain
633 F.3d 399 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge OLIVARES-PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50063. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 10, 2011. *400 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Mark Luke Frazier, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Ramon Lopez, Odessa, TX, fo
United States v. Olivares-Rodriguezpublic domain
729 F.Supp.2d 1030 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ruben OLIVARES-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. No. 09-CR-4048-DEO. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. June 3, 2010. *1031 John H. Lammers, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Michael L. Smart, Federal Public Defender's Office
United States v. Olivares, Guidelpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: Guidel Olivares appeals the judgment of conviction on the ground that the district court erred in denying his request for a downward adjustment of four levels under Sentencing Guidelines § 3B1.2 because of his minimal role in the charged conspiracy and in denying a </
United States v. Olivares-Bonillapublic domain
PER CURIAM: Alexis Antonio Olivares-Bonilla appeals his 64-month sentence imposed after he pled guilty to being an alien “found in” the United States illegally after removal due to a prior conviction for commission of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). We have reviewed the record and considered the argument of counsel and conclude that no error which is reversible under our precedent has been
United States v. Olivares-Rangelpublic domain
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Unable to agree on the meaning of I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 104 S.Ct. 3479, 82 L.Ed.2d 778 (1984), lower federal courts are divided on the question of whether, given an unlawful seizure, the “identity” of an illegal immigrant may be suppressed in the context of a § 1326 prosecution. Compare, e.g., United States v. Guzman-Bruno, 27 F.3d 420 (
United States v. Olivares-Rangelpublic domain
324 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gustavo OLIVARES-RANGEL, Defendant. No. CR 04-0528 RB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. June 30, 2004. *1219 *1220 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BRACK, District Judge. THIS
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
Filed: June 5, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7057 (CR-99-296-AW, CA-98-2476-M) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Dennis Olivares, Defendant - Appellant.
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
19 F.3d 15 U.S.v.Olivares* NO. 92-07791 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 14, 1994 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2
United States v. Olivarespublic domain
51 F.3d 1042 U.S.v.Olivares** NO. 94-10602 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 22, 1995 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 4:92-CR-155-T-3 2
United States v. Jose Olivarespublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41284 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Olivares-Cepeda v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
United States v. Luis Olivarespublic domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Luis Olivares was convicted after trial of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846, and 851 (Count 1); possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime- in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (Count 2); being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1). a
United States v. Cuenca-Olivarespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fidel Cuenca-Olivares has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cuen-ca-Olivares has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele
Olivares-Lopez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Olivares-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.