Cases

OPINION YOCK, Judge. In this military pay case, plaintiff, Joseph E. O’Hanlon, Jr., seeks: (1) Selected Ready Reserve duty pay and allowances for all inactive duty administrative drills that he attended between September 18, 1978 and August 31, 1981, for which he did not receive compensation, and (2) reinstatement in the Selected Ready Reserve and reserve duty pay and allowances due an officer in the grade

ORDER YOCK, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff’s Motion for Class Action Certification. Facts The suit was brought by the plaintiff, Joseph E. O’Hanlon, Jr., as an Army reserve officer, formerly assigned as an in*205structor with the 2073 United States Army Reserve School (U

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 19-3891 ____________ PAUL O’HANLON, an individual; JONATHAN ROBISON, an individual; GAYLE LEWANDOWSKI, an individual; IRMA ALLEN, an individual; PITTSBURGHERS FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT, a project of Thomas Merton Center, Inc., a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, on behalf of thems

MEMORANDUM LEGROME D, DAVIS, District Judge. Plaintiffs1 — six institutional Funds that invested in debt securities issued by Diagnostic Ventures, Inc. (DVI, Inc.)2 — sue for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. They also seek imposition of liability

460 F.Supp.2d 891 (2006) WM HIGH YIELD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael A. O'HANLON, et al., Defendants. No. IP-05-115-Misc. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. February 17, 2006. ENTRY ON NON-PARTY 40/86 ADVISORS, INC.'S EMERGENCY[1] MOTION TO QUASH BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.

___________ No. 94-2818 ___________ Valerie T. Akeyo, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the James O'Hanlon; Birdie Holder; * District of Nebraska. University of Nebraska at * Lincol

558 F.Supp.2d 686 (2006) SANDERS, O'HANLON & MOTLEY, P.L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY and Steinberg & Cavaliere, L.L.P., Defendants. No. 4:05-CV-498. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. July 31, 2006. *687 Roger D. Sanders, Sanders O'Hanlon & Motley, PLLC, Sherman, TX, for Plai

OPINION BLOCK, District Judge: The Central Valley Project (“CVP”) is a massive undertaking to transfer water from the northern part of California’s Central Valley to the relatively arid southern part of the valley. The project is managed by the United States Department of the Interior (“Interior”). Interior’s management of the

444 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Timothy D. Pope, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Johnny Reynolds, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, Eugene Crum, Jr., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Tommy. G. FLOWERS, et al., Defendants. Alabama State Conference of NAACP Branches, Amicus Curiae. Civil Action No. 2:68cv2709-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Div

372 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Timothy D. Pope, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Johnny Reynolds, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, Eugene Crum, Jr., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Tommy G. FLOWERS, et al., Defendants. Alabama State Conference of NAACP Branches, Amicus Curiae. Civil Action No. 2:68cv2709-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Divisi

*1059MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 819, 837, 892) OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION. On October 22, 2010, Firebaugh Canal Water District and Central California Irrigation District (“Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for summary judgment against the United States seeking jud

KAREN GREN SCHOLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Defendants'1 Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 92]. For the reasons below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. *617I. BACKGROUND A. The Federal Benefit Payment System

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Robert Lawrence appeals a summary judgment for the United States in its suit to enforce four promissory notes. Lawrence argues that the district court erred in refusing to apply the affirmative defense of laches, in finding that the government had provided competent summary judgment evidence, and in conc

ORDER AND AMENDED MEMORANDUM * ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on June 3, 2003, is amended as follows: (1) The first sentence of Paragraph 5 should be deleted and replaced with: “The district court erred in concluding that Interior lacks, discretion to refrain from crediting the amount of Project yield actually used for any (b)(2) purpose against the designate

96 F.3d 1437 E. Merwin Wheelerv.George O'Hanlon, Kathryn Perry NO. 96-3041 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Aug 07, 1996 Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 95-cv-00060E, McLaughlin, J. 1 AFFIRM

672 F.3d 676 (2012) SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY; Westlands Water District, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Pixley Irrigation District; Lower Tule River Irrigation District; Tri-Valley Water District; Hills Valley Irrigation District; Kern Tulare Water District; Rag Gulch Water District; Stockton East Water District; Fresno County; Tulare County, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, and Bay Institute of San Francisco; Save San Francisco Bay Associa

OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: The Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority (Canal Authority) appeals the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment to the Department of Interior (Interior), Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau), San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (San Luis), and Westlands Water Authority (W estlands). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm

21-3015 United States of America v. Sims 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term 2022 7 Submitted: January 13, 2023 8 Decided: February 5, 2024 9 10 No. 21-3015 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERIC

HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Valerie T. Akeyo appeals from a judgment of the district court 1 entered after a bench trial in favor of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (university or UNL) and two of its officials, Dr. James O’Hanlon, dean of UNL’s Teacher’s College, and Dr. Birdie Holder, chairperson of the Department o

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 52, 60, 62) AND MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. 77) OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................962 II.PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ................................'...........963 III. JURISDICTION.........................................................