Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. O'Connor”
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Darnell O’Connor pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which bars felons from possessing firearms. The Government argued Mr. O’Connor’s sentence should be enhanced under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “the Guidelines”) because he had a prior felony conviction for robbery un
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
CCA 20130853. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues: I. WHETHER THE APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES PAULETTE V. BURTON AND JAMES W. HERRING AS CMCR JUDGES MEANT THAT THEY NO LONGER MET THE UCMJ DEFINITION OF APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGE. II. WHETHER
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Brendan O’Connor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). O’Connor has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
CCA 38420. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to April 30, 2015.
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
632 F.3d 894 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith Darrell O'CONNOR, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-60147. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 2, 2011. *895 Richard Terrell Starrett, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jackson, MS, for U.S. George Lowrey Lucas, Sr. Lit. Counsel, Samuel Dennis Joiner,
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
650 F.3d 839 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Linda O'CONNOR, Dean Sacco, Defendants-Appellants. Docket Nos. 08-5968-cr, 08-6092-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 13, 2010. Decided: June 16, 2011. *843 Scott Meisler, Criminal Division, United States Department of Jus
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
656 F.3d 630 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Azureeiah O'CONNOR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-2476. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 7, 2010. Decided September 1, 2011. *633 Helene B. Greenwald (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, I
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
567 F.3d 395 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Travis John O'CONNOR, Appellant. No. 08-1642. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 10, 2009. Filed: May 28, 2009. *396 Wallace L. Taylor, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellant. Matt M. Dummermuth, Asst. U.S. Atty.,
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Edward D. Reagan, appointed counsel for Luis O’Connor, has filed a motion to ■withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and O’Con-nor’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Edward D. Reagan, appointed counsel for Luis O’Connor, has filed a motion to ■withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and O’Con-nor’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
321 F.Supp.2d 722 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. James F. O'CONNOR and James A. Geisler, No. Crim.1:00 CR 285. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. June 15, 2004. *723 *724 Robert Spencer, Dana Boente, U.S. Attorney's Office, Alexandria, for Plaintiffs or Petit
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant, Senior Airman Barry O’Connor, United States Air Force, was tried by general court-martial at Hurlburt Field, Florida. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of two specifications of forcible sodomy of a female under 16 years of age and four specifications of indecent acts or indecent liberties with the same victim, in violation of Articles 125 and 13
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Michael L. O’Connor appeals the 7-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release, subsequent to his underlying sentence of 12-months imposed following a conviction for transporting illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. O’Connor contends that 1) the district court faded to
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
158 F.Supp.2d 697 (2001) UNITED STATES of America v. James F. O'CONNOR and James A. Geisler, defendants. No. CRIM. 00-285-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 16, 2001. *698 *699 *700 *701
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-2044 UNITED STATES,
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant Robert O’Connor and three others were indicted on eight counts charging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (fraud by wire, radio, or television) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Principals). The indictment alleged that the defendants and others had devised a scheme to defraud and obtain money by false pretenses, representations, and promises, and had made or
United States v. O'COnnOrpublic domain
974 F.2d 1347 U.S.v.O'Connor** NO. 91-3560 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 15, 1992 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ELFVIN, District Judge. In a one-count Indictment the aboven-amed individual (“the defendant”) is charged with having, while under oath and as to matters material to an investigation then being conducted by a United States Grand Jury, knowingly given false testimony. The matter said in the Indictment to have been thus under investigation was the making of false returns, statements and ot
United States v. O'Connorpublic domain
660 F.Supp. 955 (1987) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joseph D. O'CONNOR, Defendant. No. CR87-74A. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. June 2, 1987. James E. Fagan, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff. Winship E. Rees, Lawrenceville, Ga., for defendant. ORDER OF COURT MOYE, Chief Judge.
United States v. O'COnnOrpublic domain
753 F.2d 1067 U.S.v.O'Connor 84-1341 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. 11/16/84 1 D.Mass. AFFIRMED