Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner Jose Nuñez-Rosas appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant pleaded guilty to distributing 50 or more grams of a substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, and was sentenced to 70 months in prison. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we a

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Nunez-Rosas appeals his conviction and 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Nunez-Rosas contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level enhancement to his base offense level for

SUMMARY ORDER Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, defendants-appellants Ramon Gomez and David Castellano-Nunez were convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846. Both defendants now appeal: Gomez from a July 31, 2014 judgment that principally sentence

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Antovany Acosta appeals from a judgment entered on November 14, 2013 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut convicting him, following a jury trial, of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute heroin, and of possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. The district court sentenced Acosta principally to 1

613 F.3d 18 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Natanael DE LA PAZ-RENTAS, a/k/a Nato, Defendant, Appellant. *19 United States of America, Appellee, v. Victor Sanjurjo-Nunez, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Pedro Molina-Bonilla, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Waldemar Torres-Gonzalez, a/k/a Waldy, Defendan

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

825 F.Supp. 19 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Ana MORILLO, a/k/a Rossi Colon, a/k/a Marta Fernandez, a/k/a Luz Lopez, a/k/a Gloria Velez, a/k/a Jeanette Ruiz, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Jane ARENDELL, a/k/a Maria Gonzalez, a/k/a Annette Rive

808 F.Supp. 166 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Virginia FIGUEROA, a/k/a Patris Gordon, a/k/a Lillian Navarro, a/k/a Juana Martinez, a/k/a Rita Pagan, a/k/a Mary Puig, a/k/a Rosa Rivera, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Theresa Amelia ROMAN, a/k/a

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-3333 _____________ ERSIN DOYDUK, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _______________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Agency

697 F.Supp. 1243 (1988) Rosa GALLARDO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Third Party Plaintiff, v. Jose NUNEZ, Third Party Defendant. No. CV-80-0296. United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 6, 1988. *1244 Toberoff & Tessler, New York City, for Palacio.

683 F.Supp. 56 (1988) UNITED STATES of America v. Victor TORRES, a/k/a "Victor Torres Lebron," George Torres, a/k/a "George Torres Lebron," Nelson Flores, Manuel Vasquez, a/k/a "Manny," Jesus Santiago, a/k/a "Chu," a/k/a "Chuito," Efraim Arcelay, a/k/a "Negro," Louis Rivera, Natalie Vasquez, a/k/a "Tita," Raymond Coffie, a/k/a "Meno," Fernando Padron, Dennis Rivera, Reginald Velez, a/k/a "Reggie," Rosa Flores, Pedro Cruz, Carlos Nunez, Efraim Qui

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 15-1289 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL RUDIEL CRUZ-VÁZQUEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

OPINION PER CURIAM: Defendant Vance Yukio Inouye appeals from an order setting a restitution schedule in connection with the revocation of his supervised release. We affirm. I. FACTS Inouye pleaded guilty to a count of wire fraud and a count of conspiracy, in connection with a fraudulent mortgage scheme h

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10510 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:09-cr-00115-SOM-1 VANCE YUKIO INOUYE, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: On February 4, 2014, a Grand Jury sitting in the Southern District of New York returned Indictment 14 Cr. 68, charging Ross Ulbricht (“the defendant” or “Ul-bricht”) on four counts for participation in a narcotics trafficking conspiracy (Count One), a continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) (Count Two), a computer hacking conspiracy (Coun