Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “United States v. Nuflo, Inc.”
Sedona Partners LLC v. Able Moving & Storage Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 22-13340 Document: 104-1 Date Filed: 07/25/2025 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13340 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel, SEDONA P
Morris v. Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc.public domain
ORDER R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class and Appoint Class Counsel [ECF No. 99/100]. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. I. Facts The plaintiffs or their loved ones are all former DaVita patients who suffered heart attacks during or soon after dialysis treatments a
Coby v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge. The plaintiff, James Coby, individually and on behalf of his deceased mother, Beverly Coby (“the decedent”), filed this lawsuit in Missouri state court seeking recovery for injuries sustained by and the wrongful death of the decedent allegedly resulting from the use of NaturaLyte Liquid (“NaturaLyte”) or GranuFlo Acid (“GranuFlo”) Concen
KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff John A. Healey appeals from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York following a bench trial before Robert L. Carter, Judge, (1) dismissing his claims against defendants Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. (“Dominick” or “Dominick Canada”) and its parent, Dominick & D
84Partners, LLC v. General Dynamics Electric Boatpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 21-13673 Document: 72-1 Date Filed: 08/17/2023 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13673 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.,
Troy Olhausen v. Arriva Medical, LLCpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 21-10366 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 12/20/2024 Page: 1 of 36 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10366 ____________________ TROY OLHAUSEN,
Healey v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd.public domain
OPINION ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge. John Healey, a professional investor and resident of New York instituted this action against Chelsea Resources, Ltd. (“Chelsea”), a Canadian corporation, Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. (“Dominick Canada”) and Dominick & Dominick, Inc. (“Dominick U.S.”) alleging violations of § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 111(2), § 10(b)
Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd.public domain
736 F.Supp. 488 (1990) John A. HEALEY, Plaintiff, v. CHELSEA RESOURCES LTD., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. and Dominick & Dominick, Inc., Defendants. No. 88 Civ. 6957 (RLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 24, 1990. *489 Whitman & Ransom, New York City (Michael S. Press, Michael G. Carey, Phi
Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd.public domain
OPINION ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge. The underlying facts of this case are set forth in the court’s opinion of August 31, 1990, with which familiarity is assumed. Healey v. Chelsea Resources Ltd., 132 F.R.D. 346 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Carter, J.). Michael S. Press, plaintiff’s attorney at trial, has moved through his own attorney for enlargement of the record and reargument of the c