Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ON MOTION LOURIE, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves to affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims in this case. The appellants oppose and move to continue the stay of the briefing schedule and consolidate this case with several other cases. The United States replies. The briefing schedules in this case and several other cases w

ON MOTION LOURIE, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves to affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims in this case. The appellants oppose and move to continue the stay of the briefing schedule and consolidate this case with several other cases. The United States replies. The briefing schedules in this case and several other ca

19 F.Supp.2d 1380 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Bill R. BARKER, Andrei Lee Royster, Jaromir William John, Hugh Dean Mingo, Charles Niles, Charlie T. Janes, Sr., Allen Dale Nowland, Jorge Arturo Borjas Del Cid, Bobby Riley, Jr., and John and Jane Does # 3-10, Defendants. No. CV 298-143. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division. August 26, 1

ORDER NANGLE, District Judge. On August 26, 1998, this Court ordered defendant Barker to show cause why this Court should not impose Rule 11 sanctions upon him for filing a motion with no basis in law or fact and for an improper purpose (Doc. 75). In this motion, Barker requested that the Court reconsider its denial of his motion for subpoena duces tecum, its denial of defendants’ collective mo

208 F.2d 505 NELSONv.UNITED STATES (two cases).NOWLANDv.UNITED STATES (two cases).LEEv.UNITED STATES.LOWERYv.UNITED STATES.KIRBYv.UNITED STATES.MacWILLIAMSv.UNITED STATES. (two cases).TRENTv.UNITED STATES.BRADYv.UNITED STATES. Nos. 11353-11361. No. 11363. No. 11364.

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Based on the sale of a handgun to a confidential informant, a jury convicted Roger Bugh of being a felon in possession of a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). The district court 1 sentenced Bugh to 188 months imprisonment pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act becau

NOWLAND REALTY CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.Nowland Realty Co. v. CommissionerDocket No. 34298.United States Board of Tax Appeals

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Defendant-Appellant Nadine' Garduño pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and assault resulting in serious bodily injury for her role in a fatal car accident. After sentencing, Garduño filed a motion to withdraw her guilty plea, which the district court denied as barred by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. On appeal, Garduño argues that Rule 11 did not ba

506 F.3d 1287 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nadine GARDUÑO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-2317. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 6, 2007. *1288 Brian A. Pori, Inocente, P.C., Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant-Appellant. Laura Fashing, Assistant United States Attorney (Larry Gomez

DIAL, Justice, concurring. I concur in the result. The testimony of Nowland’s attorney that he signed the demand letter “which was placed in a wrapper, correctly addressed with the correct amount of postage and placed into a United States depository for the United States mail,” is direct evidence raising the rebuttable presumption that the letter was received. Southland Life Insuranc

*412OPINION. TRammell: The petitioner contends that the respondent erred in including in its gross income for each of the years 1924 and 1925 the amount of $7,000 constructively received by it as lessor from Schmidt as lessee to provide for the retirement of portions of its preferred stock. The evidence indicates that it has been th

447 U. S. 905; and 451 U. S. 991. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

SOPER, Circuit Judge. This case brings up for review the Tax Court’s approval of determinations by the Commissioner of income tax deficiencies against the petitioning taxpayers for the years 1948 to 1950 inclusive. The taxpayers are Robert L. Nowland and Mary C. Nowland, his wife, Charles E. Nelson and Virginia M. Nelson, his wife, and the North Beach Amusement Company, Inc. The taxes in question were assessed upon (1) the i

BROWN, C. This cause was instituted in the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, March 10, 1914. The petition, after alleging the corporate character of the plaintiff and defendant surety company, proceeds as follow^: “And plaintiff for cause of action states that heretofore, to-wit, on the 27th day of October, 1913, de*506fendant Edward Nowland, Jr.,