Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Nolasco-Morales”
United States v. Gaspar-Felipepublic domain
Case: 19-50997 Document: 00515936062 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2021
United States v. Ordoñezpublic domain
Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge Pedro Jose Ordoñez is facing trial for illegal reentry into the United States after prior removal,1 in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). Indictment, ECF No. 1. If convicted, he faces imprisonment of up to twenty years. He has f
KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners, four children of Salvadoran and Honduran origin and their mothers, appear before us for a second time to challenge their expedited orders of removal. In Castro v. United States Department of Homeland Security , 835 F.3d 422
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 17-2159 _______________ WENDY AMPARO OSORIO-MARTINEZ Individually and on behalf of her minor child, D.S.R.-O., and all others similarly situated; CARMEN ALEYDA LOBO MEJIA, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, A.D.M.-L., and all other similarly situated; MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ
Nolasco v. United Statespublic domain
358 F.Supp.2d 224 (2004) Eddy Bello NOLASCO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent. No. 02 Civ. 3451(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 3, 2004. *225 *226 Eddy Bello Nolasco, McRae Federal Correctional Institution, McRae, Georgia, Petitioner pro se.
United States v. De Jesus-Batrespublic domain
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this direct criminal appeal, the defendants appeal their convictions and sentences on charges of harboring illegal aliens for financial gain and conspiracy to hold aliens hostage. Based on arguments of counsel, our review of the briefs and the record, we AFFIRM their convictions, MODIFY their sentences on Count One and otherwise AFFIRM their over
United States v. Nolasco-Rosaspublic domain
PER CURIAM: Defendant-Appellant Nolasco-Rosas (“Nolasco”) was indicted for transporting undocumented aliens within the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (B)(i). He was tried by a jury and convicted of aiding and abetting, and was sentenced to thirty-three months of imprisonment. He chal
United States v. Waltonpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-4498 ERIC ARTHUR WALTON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-4537 ELDRIDGE MAYFIELD, a/k/a Sippy, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, a
United States v. Andujarpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. On July 17, 1992, defendants Amador Iri-zarry-Sanabria, José Salvador Andújar, and Pedro Infante-Ruiz were convicted by a jury in federal district court for conspiracy to import approximately 3000 pounds of marijuana and for the possession of a firearm in relation to the commission of said narcotics offense, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 963, and
United States v. Sanabriapublic domain
USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-2376 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v.
United States v. Eric Arthur Walton, United States of America v. Eldridge Mayfield, A/K/A Sippypublic domain
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge WILLIAMS wrote concurring opinions. Judge WIDENER wrote a dissenting opinion. Judge KING wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN, Judge WILKINS, and Judge TRAXLER joined. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION PER CURIAM: This case came to be argued before the en banc court on April
Armitage v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This case is before the court on the Government’s motion to dismiss 134 plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases allege that they were and are entitled to premium and overtime pay for regularly-scheduled overtime, Súnday and holiday hours during authorized leave from work under the “leave with pay” provisions of the Federal Employees
HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Claudia Escudero-Corona petitions this court for judicial review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her application for suspension of deportation on the ground that she could not establish seven years of continuous physical presence in the United States to make her eligible for a suspension of deportation. She also seeks judicial r
Xiquin Xirum v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1413 JACINTO XIQUIN XIRUM; BARTOLA ROMERO SANTOS, Petitioners, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Barron, Chief
Lopez Cano v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1941 GLENDY MARLENY LOPEZ CANO, Petitioner, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Ge
Ortiz Trejo v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1412 MARIANO ORTIZ TREJO, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Monteca
Dawson v. YMCA of Long Island, Inc.public domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), entered March 18, 2013, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof denying those branches of the defe
Mendez Nolasco v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1947 GUSTAVO EVELIO MENDEZ NOLASCO and BLANCA AMERICA NIZ MENDEZ, Petitioners, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEAL
Ana Hernandez Guardado v. Pamela Bondipublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2286 Doc: 36 Filed: 08/05/2025 Pg: 1 of 11 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2286 ANA CECILIA HERNANDEZ GUARDADO, Petitioner, v. PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General, Responden
Rivera Samayoa v. Bondipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1432 MIGUEL ARMANDO RIVERA SAMAYOA, Petitioner, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General of the United States,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Gelpí, Lipez, and