⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “United States v. Nogueira-Ramos”

District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 86 F. Supp. 3d 64; 2015 WL 629301
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. A district court may refer a pending motion to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.CivJP. 72(a); Loc. Rule 72(b). Any party adversely affected by the report and recommendation may file written objections within fourteen days of'being served with the magistrate judge’s report. Loc. Rule 72(d). See
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000-06-27 · Published · cited 26× · 216 F.3d 163
216 F.3d 163 (1st Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.RAFAEL COLLAZO-APONTE, a/k/a RAFI, a/k/a RAFAELITO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.HERIBERTO ORTIZ-SANTIAGO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.ANDRES COLON-MIRANDA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.EDWIN ORTIZ-FIGUEROA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.DAVID SAMUEL Martinez-VELEZ, De
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000-06-27 · Published · cited 56× · 216 F.3d 163; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1311; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14658
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. This appeal arises from a sixty-six count criminal indictment charging the eight appellants — Rafael Collazo-Aponte, Heriberto Ortiz-Santiago, Andrés Colón-Miranda, Edwin Ortiz-Figueroa, David S. Martínez-Vélez, Jorge Merced-Morales, Ramón A. Ríos-Ríos, and Edwin Rosario-Rodrí-guez — with numerous offenses related to a decade-long, multi-drug-dealing conspiracy based in the Virgilio Dávila public hous
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-04-27 · Published · cited 8× · 996 F.3d 552
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 20-35391 CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF D.C. No. DELAWARE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; 2:20-cv-00111- STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF RAJ ILLINOIS; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF OPINION MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; S
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005-08-02 · Published · cited 11× · 90 Conn. App. 460; 878 A.2d 321; 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 332
Opinion SCHALLER, J. The petitioner, Darryl Whitaker, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting him partial relief on his claim that the respondent, the commissioner of correction, miscalculated various credits on his criminal sentence. On appeal, the petitioner’s numerous statutory and constitutional claims1 can be sorted into two categories of claimed error