Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, BAKER, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. JustinKhang P. NGUYEN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Case No. 1:17-cr-00238 (TNM) TAI TAN NGUYEN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Tai Nguyen is charged with bulk cash smuggling, failure to file a currency report, and knowingly making false statements to government

ORDER Viet Nguyen is before us a second time challenging his sentence for wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and income tax evasion, 26 U.S.C. § 7201. Initially the district court sentenced him below the guidelines range to 96 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release, but on direct appeal we granted the parties’ joint motion to remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Thompson, 777 F.3d 368 (7th Cir. 2015).

OPINION * HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Appellant Wally Nguyen was convicted by a jury of breaking several federal laws in connection with his involvement in the employment of illegal aliens. One of his convictions was for the unlawful transportation of illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii). Nguyen claims that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient t

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, K.M. MCDONALD, J.P. ELLINGTON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MINH H. NGUYEN INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRICIAN THIRD CLASS (E-4), U.S. NAVY

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, J. MCFARLANE, K.J. BRUBAKER Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRADLEY Q. NGUYEN GUNNER’S MATE FIRST CLASS (E-6), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 201400429 SPECI

MEMORANDUM ** Richard V. Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Nguyen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Nguyen the opportunity to file a

OPINION GARTH, Circuit Judge: On February 13, 2008, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Nguyen with: (1) conspiracy to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, (2) conspiracy to distribute MDMA, (3) distribution of methamphetamine, ecstasy, and ketamine, and (4) conspiracy to import 60,000 MDMA pills from Canada. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 952(a), 963. Nguyen was tried and convicted of

*823OPINION OF THE COURT McKee, Circuit Judge. Michael Nguyen and Thuy Le both appeal the respective sentences that were imposed after they were convicted of conspiracy to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm. I. The first of Nguyen’s several arguments is that

*823OPINION OF THE COURT McKee, Circuit Judge. Michael Nguyen and Thuy Le both appeal the respective sentences that were imposed after they were convicted of conspiracy to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm. I. The first of Nguyen’s several arguments is that

608 F.3d 368 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Van Phong NGUYEN, also known as Buffalo, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nam Trong Tung Nguyen, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 08-3940, 09-1026. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 21, 2009. Filed: June 14, 2010.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-30197 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-05-00270-05- TUYET THI-BACH NGUYEN, RSL Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

OPINION GARTH, Circuit Judge: On February 13, 2008, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Nguyen with: (1) conspiracy to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, (2) conspiracy to distribute MDMA, (3) distribution of methamphetamine, ecstasy, and ketamine, and (4) conspiracy to import 60,000 MDMA pills from Canada. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 952(a), 963. Nguyen was tried and convicted of

655 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Thu NGUYEN, aka Nguyen Thu, Thu Tony Le, Thu Le, Thu Lee, Thu Lenguyen, Thu T. Nguyen, Thu Tony Nguyen, Thu L. Nguyen, Thu Tony Le Nguyen, Thu Tony Lee Nguyen, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-0875-CG-B. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 28, 2009.

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 1 and the re *463 cently amended guidelines for cocaine base (“crack”) offenses.

504 F.3d 561 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tam NGUYEN; Myna Tran, Defendants-Appellants. No. 06-10686. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 12, 2007. *562 *563 *564 *565 Daniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Magistrate Judge No. 25-170 PAUL NGUYEN, Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Magistrate Judge No. 25-148 NATHALIE ROSE JONES, Defendant. M

507 F.3d 836 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Huy Tan NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-20598. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 7, 2007. *837 Renata Ann Gowie and James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Steven Jay Rozan, Steven Rozan & Associates, Houst

542 F.3d 275 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Quoc NGUYEN, Defendant, Appellant. No. 07-1217. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 3, 2008. Decided September 19, 2008. *276 Christie M. Charles, with whom George F. Gormley, P.C. was on brief, for appellant. Donald C. L

B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The admission of detective Wirth’s testimony was error and it was not harmless. No eye witness or physical evidence tied Nguyen to the crime or the crime scene. The only reliable evidence from which inferences could be drawn were the cell phone records that only proved that the known robber-shooter and Nguyen communicated frequ