Cases

56 F.3d 74NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joseph John NARDI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50374. United States Cour

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

[Cite as PennyMac Corp. v. Nardi, 2014-Ohio-5710.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO PENNYMAC CORP., : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2014-P-0014 - vs - : LOIS J. NARDI,

662 F.3d 107 (2011) George J. NARDI, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Peter PEPE, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institute, Concord, Respondent, Appellee. No. 11-1247. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard October 4, 2011. Decided November 22, 2011. *108 Stewart T. Graham, Jr. with whom Graham

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Bernard V. Nardi, Jr. was convicted, after a ten-day bench trial, of conspiracy to commit certain bank robberies in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, receipt of the proceeds of one bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and being an accessory after the fact by assisting in conceal

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Giovanna Nardi began working for ALG Worldwide Logistics (“ALG”) in Janúary 2006. ALG utilizes the services of Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. (“TLC”), a professional employer organization, to provide human resources services, including payroll and benefits administration. By October 2006, Nardi’s supervisors

MEMORANDUM PERRY, District Judge. This is an action brought by the Trustee of the residuary trust under the Will of Henrietta S. Seipp, deceased, to recover federal estate taxes alleged to have been erroneously and illegally assessed and collected. Henrietta S. Seipp who died December 23, 1960, left a Will, Article VIII of which created a residuary trust with a life income interest to he

Cordy, J. In the days preceding and following Christmas, 2002, Dianne Barchard failed to show up for work or maintain contact with her friends. After a missing person report was filed, her body was found in an advanced stage of decomposition on the floor of her bedroom in an apartment she shared with her son George Nardi. Nardi was subsequently indicted for her murder and, after a six-day trial, was found guilty of murder in the

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Jeanette Foxworth appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered November 15, 2007, sentencing her primarily to fifteen months’ imprisonment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal. Foxworth argues first that her convictions for honest services wire fraud and conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud must b

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Jeanette Foxworth appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered November 15, 2007, sentencing her primarily to fifteen months’ imprisonment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal. Foxworth argues first that her convictions for honest services wire fraud and conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud must b

*72SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant David M. Scott (“Scott”) appeals from a February 8, 2008 order of restitution issued by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. He primarily challenges the District Court’s conclusion that the amount of restitution available under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, includes lost investment

*72SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant David M. Scott (“Scott”) appeals from a February 8, 2008 order of restitution issued by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. He primarily challenges the District Court’s conclusion that the amount of restitution available under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, includes lost investment

605 F.3d 319 (2010) WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 08-5950. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 29, 2009. Decided and Filed: May 17, 2010. *320 ARGUED: James E. Burke, Jr.,

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered January 24, 1997, which, as limited by plaintiffs brief, granted the motion of defendants Richard Memoli, M.D., and Richard Memoli, M.D., P. C., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated. On September 21, 1989, Dr. David M. Hirsh and Dr. Richard Memoli performed

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: In our previous opinion in this case, we affirmed Defendant-Appellant Ogle’s conviction and sentence. See United States v. Ogle,

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered September 30, 1996, which, in a medical malpractice action, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment insofar as made on behalf of defendant David M. Hirsh, M.D., P. C., and denied such motion insofar as made on behalf of defendants David M. Hirsh, M.D. and University Orthopaedic Specialty Associates, (University Associates) unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the complaint as

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This sentencing appeal concerns the procedural issue of the standard of review for decisions applying the Sentencing Guidelines to facts — in this case a decision applying the Guidelines’ grouping rules — and the substantive issue of whether two episodes of unlawful sexual activity by a prison guard with an inmate, occurring on separate days, should be inc

75 F.Supp.2d 61 (1999) Vittorio NARDI, Plaintiff, v. STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Defendant. No. CIV. A.96CV4508DGT. United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 13, 1999. William Mullin, Graham, Miller, Neandross, Mullin & Roonan, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff. Raymond C. Fay, Andrew N. Cook, Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, Washington, D.C., for

OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Stephen Nardi (Nardi) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on statute of limitations grounds. Nardi obtained a Certificate of Appealability (COA) limited to whether he had demonstrated an impediment to timely filing his petition o

60 F.Supp.2d 31 (1999) Vittorio NARDI, Plaintiff, v. STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-CV-4508(DGT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 17, 1999. *32 *33 *34 William Mullin, Graham, Miller, Neandross, Mullin &a;