Cases

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6957 Doc: 68 Filed: 10/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 35 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6957 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GARFIELD REDD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from th

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 6, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR TH

Case: 19-40526 Document: 00515593307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 7, 2020

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring: I am pleased to join Chief Judge Gregory’s fine opinion. It reaches the right result, and for the right reasons. The ACCA’s force clause covers acts of intimidation and a strong arm robbery is the quintessential act of intimidation—whether or not actual physical force is used. This was a point we made in United States v. McNeal, 818 F.3d 141 (4th Cir. 2016). I hope tha

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in Section III.B of the majority opinion, in Section I of Judge Dennis’s dissenting opinion, and in full in Judge Smith’s dissenting opinion. Because “felony” under Texas Penal Code § 46.04 is defined more broadly than, hence not “defined in,” 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), I agree with Ju

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 18‐2009, 18‐2218, 18‐2286, 18‐3303, and 19‐1299 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. REYNOLD DE LA TORRE, et al., Defendants‐Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 18‐2009, 18‐2218, 18‐2286, 18‐3303, and 19‐1299 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. REYNOLD DE LA TORRE, et al., Defendants‐Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the

PER CURIAM: Tomas Puga-Yanez (“Puga-Yanez”) appeals his sentence. Puga-Yanez contends that the district court committed reversible error by applying a sixteen-level sentencing enhancement based on his prior conviction of child molestation. For the *319 reasons that follow, we AFFIRM Puga-Yanez’s sen

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: In 2013, Marlon Flores-Granados pled guilty to a single-count indictment for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation and a conviction for an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). He now challenges his sentence, specifically the 16-level enhancement that wa

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 465 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 466 OPINION This is a worker's compensation1 case. On Au

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2317 CZESLAW M. PARZYCH, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of a

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-3318 ILIR OSMANI, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an Order

Filed 12/16/13 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A134480 v. MARCELLOUS LEWIS, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 163699)

Affirmed and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00209-CV KATHY HARPST, STEPHANIE HARTFIELD, FREDIA RICE, JO’QUITA SANDERS, SHANNON MALM, AND LAGEAN MEDEARIS, Appellants V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Opinion KRUGER, J. A jury convicted defendant Pedro Rangel, Jr., of the first degree murders of Juan Uribe and Chuck Durbin. (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a); id.. former § 189.) The jury also found true a multiple-murder special-circumstance allegation and, as to Durbin’s murder, a personal firearm use sentence-enhancement allegation. (Pen. Code, § 190.2, sub

Filed 12/11/13 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B239867 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. C

DECISION RE: THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Marvin J. Garbis, United States District Judge The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6) to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint [ECF No. 133] and the materials submitted relating thereto. The Court has held a hearing and had the benefit of the arguments of counsel. 1. BACKGROUND1<