Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, GROSS, PICTON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Benjamin A. NUNEZ Personnel Specialist First Class Petty Officer (E-6)

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nancy Nunez's Objections to the Presentence Report, Motion for Reasonable Sentence and Sentencing Memorandum, filed September 14, 2018 (Doc. 15)("Objections"). The primary issue is whether the 2-level enhancement for Abuse of a Position of Public or Private Trust applies when the Defendant Nancy Nunez used her Bureau of I

PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge Defendant Jaime Reyes Nunez ("Reyes Nunez") is charged under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1) with illegal reentry into the United States subsequent to the entry of a deportation order in 2006. Reyes Nunez moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to

MEMORANDUM ** Robert Michael Nunez appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Nunez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Nunez the opportunity to fi

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 14-2297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOWENKY NUÑEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Be

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 15-2412 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. OSCAR NUÑEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Bef

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Everardo Nunez-Guerrero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nunez-Guerrero has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva

ORDER Francisco Javier Nunez pleaded guilty to two counts of using a cell phone to facilitate a drug conspiracy. See 21 U.S.C. § 848(b). The district court held Nunez accountable for conspiring to distribute 8,500 grams of marijuana and 509 grams of cocaine. Taking these drug quantities into account, the court calculated a Guidelines range of 57 to 71 months’ imprisonment and sentenced Nunez below that range to 48 months. Nunez

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jovo Vargas Nunez pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to Count 1, conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine. After the district court granted Nunez a two-level downward variance, it sentenced him to 132 months of imprisonment,

CCA 20100703. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to July 20, 2012.

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, petitioner Billyhens Nunez-Polanco moves to vacate his convictions for (1) conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin and (2) possession with intent to distribute heroin, on the grounds that his trial counsel was ineffective. Nunez-Po-lanco’s petition for relief is denied because he has no

ORDER ** Appellee’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Sentence and Remand for Resentencing, filed February 4, 2015, is GRANTED. The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

673 F.3d 661 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario NUNEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1927. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 25, 2012. Decided March 9, 2012. Andrew S. Boutros (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

ORDER A jury convicted Bernabe Nunez-Guzman on three of eight counts of a second superseding indictment charging him and nine others with participating in the large-scale cultivation of marijuana near Green Bay, Wisconsin. The district court ordered him to serve 136 months in prison, a term well below the low end of the range suggested by the Sentencing Guidelines. Nunez-Guzman appeals both his conviction and sentence. He contends that

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Carlos Gabriel Nunez-Salomon raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2374, 185 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, this court, relying upon its holding in United States v. Joslin,

627 F.3d 274 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel NUNEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-1384. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 14, 2010. Decided November 30, 2010. *276 Erica N. O'Neil, Tracy M. Johnson (argued), Attorneys, Office of the United States Attorn

OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. Appellant Maria Nunez pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit food stamp fraud, and was sentenced to a forty-three month term of imprisonment. Her appeal is before us pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3557 & 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We will affirm. I. BACKGROUND On March 20, 2008, Maria Nunez pleaded guilty to an indictment charging her

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Nunez appeals from the district court’s order of detention pending trial. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the proceedings below, and the issues on appeal. The district court concluded that Nunez posed a risk of flight and that no condition or combination of conditions could reasonably assure his presence at trial. Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the di

MEMORANDUM ** Before the district court, the government alleged that, along with several others, Defendants-Appellants Mario Arriaga-Nunez, aka, Jorge Alexander Canchóla (Canchóla) and Javier Castaneda transported and distributed large quantities of methamphetamine in Nevada and Idaho. Canchóla pled guilty and requested a 188-month sentence, which the district court imposed. On appeal, Canchóla argues that

MEMORANDUM ** Onecimo Nunez-Rodriguez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 *660(1967), Nune