Cases

782 F.Supp. 996 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joseph A. NARDONE, Defendant. Civ. No. 90-163. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. May 11, 1990. Robert J. DeSousa, U.S. Attorney's Office, Lewisburg, Pa., for plaintiff U.S. Ian M. Stuart, Philadelphia, Pa., and Ian M. Stuart, Stuart & Olizi, Audubon, N.J., for defendant Joseph A

925 F.2d 420 U.S.v.Nardone (Joseph A.) NOS. 90-5418, 90-5519 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. JAN 17, 1991 1 Appeal From: M.D.Pa. 2 AFFIRMED.

842 F.2d 1293 U.S.v.Nardone (William) NO. 87-6675 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. MAR 04, 1988 1 Appeal From: S.D.W.Va. 2 IFP DENIED--DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFI

774 F.2d 1156 U.S.v.Nardone 84-5220 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 10/4/85 1 S.D.W.Va. AFFIRMED

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Motion for bail denied.

106 F.2d 41 (1939) UNITED STATES v. NARDONE et al. No. 412. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 20, 1939. Writ of Certiorari Granted October 9, 1939. *42 David V. Cahill, of New York City, for Frank Carmine Nardone. Wegman & Climenko, of New York City (Jesse Climenko and Eugene J. Davidson,

127 F.2d 521 (1942) UNITED STATES v. NARDONE et al. No. 208. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 7, 1942. David V. Cahill and Louis Halle, both of New York City, for appellants. Maxwell S. McKnight and Mathias F. Correa, U. S. Atty., both of New York City, for appellee. Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges. L. HAND, Circui

90 F.2d 630 (1937) UNITED STATES v. NARDONE et al. No. 342. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 14, 1937. Thomas O'Rourke Gallagher, of Brooklyn, for defendant-appellant Nardone. Joseph P. Nolan, of New York City, for defendants-appellants Callahan and Brown. Louis Halle, of New York City, for defendant-appellant Gottfried. Lamar Hard

Ullmann, Robert L., J. INTRODUCTION This action arises from the firing of plaintiff Anthony Nardone (“Nardone”), an at-will employee of defendant Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”), following what Nardone alleges was whistleblowing activity protected by public policy. Raytheon has moved to dismiss Nardone’s Complaint alleging breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count 1) and common-law wro

Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered October 5, 1999 in Ulster County, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate a default judgment entered against her. The parties were married in 1966 and divorced in 1976. Following their subsequent remarriages to and divorces from others, they reunited and lived together until defendant left plaintiff to marry someone else. In May 1997, pl

PER CURIAM: Disposition of these appeals has been held in abeyance awaiting the decisions of the Supreme» Court of the United States in United States v. Chavez, 416 U.S. 562, 94 S.Ct. 1849, 40 L.Ed.2d 380 (1974) and United States v. Giordano, 416 U.S. 505, 94 S.Ct. 1820, 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974). A careful study of these opinions conv

OPINION COWEN, Circuit Judge. This immigration matter has already been before this Court once before on a petition for review. Bernardo Castillo previously petitioned for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which dismissed his appeal from an order of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for cancellation of remov

752 A.2d 859 (2000) 332 N.J. Super. 126 The PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff, v. Richard J. NARDONE, D.C., et al., Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County. Decided March 20, 2000. *860 Michael F. Midlige, Lebanon, for plaintiff (Victor A. Rotolo, atto

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted, limited to the question whether the trial court correctly disposed of petitioners’ claim that a portion of the respondent’s evidence was procured through the illegal interception of telephone and telegraph messages and the question of the propriety , of a preliminary inquiry to ascertain that fact. Mr. David V. Cahill for Nardone,

Nardone v. Deutsche Bank (CORRECTED) 13-CV-390-SM 04/04/14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Hope Nardone, Plaintiff v. Case No. 13-cv-390-SM Opinion No. 2014 DNH 065 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-OPT4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT4, Defenda

308 U.S. 338 (1939) NARDONE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. No. 240. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 14, 1939. Decided December 11, 1939. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. David V. Cahill for Frank Carmine Nardone; Mr. Jesse Climenko, with whom Mr. J. Bertram Wegman was on the brief,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Germar Scheerer petitions this Court for review of two Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decisions. First, Scheerer seeks review of the BIA’s decision affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) order (1) denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158, 1231(b)(3)

Gershengorn, J. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ separate motions for partial summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56. In the underlying action, plaintiff, Theresa Nardone (“Nardone”), alleges that Cambridge Hospital and two doctors are liable for injuries she sustained when the defendant doctors gave her a blood transfusion, in contravention of her instructions and in