⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Muse”

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017-02-16 · Published · cited 0×
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600394 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MYLIC T. MUSE Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 0× · 638 F. App'x 248
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angela Muse appeals the district court’s order affirming the memorandum opinion and order of the magistrate judge and overruling Muse’s objection to the writ of continuing garnishment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm fo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 475 F. App'x 924
• Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angela Muse appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying her motion to dismiss the writ of continuing garnishment entered against her. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We grant the motion. We dispense
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 729 F. Supp. 2d 905; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89520; 2010 WL 3064391
729 F.Supp.2d 905 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Brady MUSE, Jr., Defendant. Case No. 09-20581. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 2, 2010. *906 Stephen L. Hiyama, U.S. Attorney's Office, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTIO
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008-09-12 · Published · cited 0× · 292 F. App'x 862
PER CURIAM: Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Michael Muse in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relat
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 311 F. App'x 394
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Leo Muse and Darrell Hil-lard appeal from their judgments of conviction entered on February 13, 2008 in the Northern District of New York (Scullin, /.) for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute an unspecified quantity of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). On appeal, defendants challenge (1) the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the district court’
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 311 F. App'x 394
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Leo Muse and Darrell Hil-lard appeal from their judgments of conviction entered on February 13, 2008 in the Northern District of New York (Scullin, /.) for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute an unspecified quantity of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). On appeal, defendants challenge (1) the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the district court’
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-5315 RANDALL DWAYNE MUSE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-311-MJG) Argued: March 8, 1996 Decided: May 13, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circu
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016-06-08 · Published · cited 0× · 191 F. Supp. 3d 562; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78357; 2016 WL 3387172
SHOW CAUSE ORDER REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Petitioner’s pro se “Motion Under- 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, .or Correct Sentence” (“Motion”), filed by .the Clerk on May 27, 2016. ECF No. 285.1 On March 13, 2014, the Petitioner pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, which charged the Petitioner with Conspiracy to Distr
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 844 F.2d 795; 1988 WL 32421
844 F.2d 795 U.S.v.Muse** NO. 87-5336 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. MAR 29, 1988 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 588 F.2d 824
588 F.2d 824 U. S.v.Muse No. 78-1519, 78-1520 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 11/20/78 1 D.N.J. AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 620 F.2d 290
620 F.2d 290 U. S.v.Muse 79-1877 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 4/16/80 1 D.N.J. AFFIRMED
Duran v. Musepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 94; 202 L. Ed. 2d 60
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 530 F.2d 965
530 F.2d 965 U. S.v.Muse 75-1930 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 2/11/76 1 D.N.J. AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 486 F.2d 1317; 159 U.S. App. D.C. 57
486 F.2d 1317 159 U.S.App.D.C. 57 U. S.v.Muse 73-1108 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 10/26/73 1 D.C.D.C. VACATED IN PART AFFIRMED IN PART
Mathis v. Musepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 2175; 198 L. Ed. 2d 234; 85 U.S.L.W. 3553; 2017 WL 1408776; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3349
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Muse v. Georgiapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 1770; 188 L. Ed. 2d 602; 82 U.S.L.W. 3566; 572 U.S. 1039; 2014 WL 675501; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2299
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Goodman v. Musepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 172; 190 L. Ed. 2d 122; 83 U.S.L.W. 3188; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5668
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 531 U.S. 1176; 121 S. Ct. 1152
Ct. App. D. C. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-03-07 · Published · cited 4× · 289 B.R. 619; 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 270; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 177; 2003 WL 1023310
289 B.R. 619 (2003) In re Cheryl R. MUSE, Debtor. Richard Muse, Plaintiff, v. Cheryl R. Muse, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-20925BM, Adversary No. 02-2694-BM. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 7, 2003. *620 Martha E. Bailor, Esq., Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. George T. Snyder, Esq., Stonecipher,