Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) v. § Criminal No. 13-025 (RJL) MONIQUE MURDOCK, § F I L E D Derendam. § JuL 27 2017 (2 C|ark, U.S. District & Bankruptcy MEMORA [)UM OPINION Courts for the D|strict of Co|umb|a (July g 2017) [Dkt. # 34] Currently pending before the Court is defendant Monique Murdock’s Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release [Dkt. # 34]. Upon consideration of the Motion, the parties’ briefs, the relevant laW, and

*107 KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendant Seth Murdock, who is scheduled to be released from federal prison on November 15, 2013, and thus to commence serving his term of supervised release on that date, see 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e), appeals pro se from an order of the Unite

McCONNELL, District Judge. A jury convicted Eric Murdock of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Mr. Murdock was sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (“ACCA”), to 216 months in prison. On appeal, Mr. Murdock argues that the district court erred in three ways, by (i) refusing to suppress his statement regardi

806 F.Supp.2d 285 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Eric MURDOCK, Defendant. No. 2:11-cr-08-DBH. United States District Court, D. Maine. August 24, 2011. *286 Darcie N. McElwee, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Maine, Portland, ME, for United States of America. Neale A. D

PER CURIAM: Carlton Lamont Murdock appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murdock, No. 7:08-cr-00010-JCT-l (W.D.Va. Dec. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-2183 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KYRON MURDOCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0073p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Pla

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Franklin Murdock pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana pursuant to a Rule 11 plea agreement. Murdock admitted guilt under oath at his plea hearing and was sentenced to 78 months of incarceration. After filing a direct appeal of his sentence, Murdock subsequently filed a motion in the district court to withdraw his guilty plea. Murdock alleges that, at the time of his

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4150 PERRY VON MURDOCK, Defendant-Appellant, ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Filed December 22, 1997 Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. Defendant-Appellant Perry Von Murdoch's

919 F.Supp. 1534 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Perry Von MURDOCK, Defendant. No. 93-CR-308G. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 5, 1996. *1535 Scott M. Matheson, Jr., United States Attorney, Stephen Roth and Matthew R. Howell, Assistant United States Attorneys, Salt Lake City, UT, for

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/3/96 TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) ) No. 95-4071 MURDOCK MACHINE AND

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

627 F.Supp. 272 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James W. MURDOCK, Defendant. Civ. No. F 85-374. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. December 16, 1985. Supplemental Order January 24, 1986. *273 Charles J. Brunette, Atty. for Veterans Admin., Indianapolis, Ind., for plain

OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. Plaintiff Victoria Lynn Murdock, trustee of the John S. Murdock Inter Vivos Trust, seeks the refund of $3,973 in taxes allegedly overpaid by Mr. Murdock for tax years 2001 through 2004. The United States (“the government”) has moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely, contending that 26 U.S.C. (“I.R.C.”) § 6511(b)(2) precludes any recovery. Ms. Murdock responds that the toll

714 F.2d 134 U. S.v.Murdock 82-5315 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 7/11/83 1 W.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: The question in this criminal case is whether appellee’s statements, which the government concedes the police obtained in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, are nonetheless admissible for purposes of impeachment should he testify at trial. The

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Kyron Murdock was caught with marijuana and crack cocaine in his pocket after fleeing from police, and later admitted that the drugs, as well as a gun police found in a nearby garbage can, belonged to him. Prior to his jury trial on drug and gun possession charges, Murdock moved to suppress his confession, claiming that it was involuntary because the police

508 F.2d 839 U. S.v.Murdock 74-1926 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 12/23/74 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge: These are consolidated appeals by Dr. Murdock Head from an interlocutory pretrial order denying his “double jeopardy” pleas, No. 81-5128, and from a final judgment of conviction on a two-count indict *1203 ment charging conspiracy to bribe and to evade taxes