Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Hugo Munoz-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Munoz-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele

MEMORANDUM *** Defendant-Appellant Jorge Munoz-Ramirez argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss Count 2 of the indictment and by denying the mo*958tion to suppress Ms sworn statement. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. The district court properly denied Munoz-Ramirez’s motion to

OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Juan Carlos Ramirez-Munoz and Maria Beatriz' Adriana Francia-Alva-rez petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) decision to deny the motion to reopen their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT)!

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EFRAÍN RAMÍREZ MUÑOZ, No. 21-70431 Petitioner, Agency No. A022-446-571 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DAVID COUNTS, United States Magistrate Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Petitioner Maria Marcella Rodriguez Munoz’ Verified Petition for Return of Child. (Doc. 1). This case was referred to the Magistrate Judge for the Midland/Odessa Division on August 2, 2012, by Order of Referral from the United States District Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Appendix C of the Loc

139 F.3d 34 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Saul MANGUAL-CORCHADO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ernesto CIRILO-MUNOZ, a/k/a Nesty, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Luis Antonio RAMIREZ-YNOA, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 96-1307, 96-1308, 96-1476. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit.

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*1055ante, p. 813; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 823; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 828; *1056</

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 117); (95 Fed. Appx. 606); (93 Fed. Appx. 663); (95 Fed. Appx. 118); (95 Fed. Appx. 582); (95 Fed. Appx. 629); (95 Fed. Appx. 661); (95 Fed. Appx. 662); (95 Fed. Appx. 630); (95 Fed. Appx. 645); (92 Fed. Appx. 990); (95 Fed. Appx. 631); <

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.