Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Munoz-Pena”
Drury v. United Statespublic domain
*1055ante, p. 813; ante, p. 816; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 821; ante, p. 808; ante, p. 823; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 828; *1056</
Bishop v. United Statespublic domain
*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;
Bishop v. United Statespublic domain
*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Camarillo-Velasquez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 495); (101 Fed. Appx. 530); (101 Fed. Appx. 531); (101 Fed. Appx. 537); (101 Fed. Appx. 484); (101 Fed. Appx. 526); (101 Fed. Appx. 554); (101 Fed. Appx. 494); and (101 Fed. Appx. 556). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Campuspublic domain
Appellate Case: 24-5068 Document: 69-1 Date Filed: 08/04/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH August 4, 2025
United States v. Hanktonpublic domain
Case: 16-30995 Document: 00516508469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
United States v. Campos-Ayalapublic domain
Case: 21-50642 Document: 189-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-50642 June 7, 2024
United States v. Darius Fieldspublic domain
Case: 19-10639 Document: 00515588332 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 2,
Retfalvi v. United Statespublic domain
JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge On September 14, 2017, Paul M. Retfalvi ("plaintiff" or "Retfalvi") filed this action *794against the United States ("defendant" or "United States") seeking a tax refund under 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States v. Munozpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge. Defendants Miguel Munoz (“Munoz”) and Marilyn Montalvo (“Montalvo,” a/k/a “Ramona Munoz”), joined by all the remaining defendants, move pursuant to Rules 41 and 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a search conducted on February 6, 1990 by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States v. Munozpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge. Defendant Rodolfo Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) moves to suppress statements made at the place of his arrest and later at the offices of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) of *169the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This Court held an evidentiary hearing o
United States v. Munozpublic domain
738 F.Supp. 800 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Miguel MUNOZ, a/k/a "Beeper", Rodolfo Rodriguez, Enrique Houellemont, a/k/a "Ereppa", Daniel Bretton, a/k/a "Raoul", Cristo Rey Ramirez-Pena, a/k/a "Bacalao", Victor Alberto Gil, a/k/a "Vitico", Nelson Omar Tabar-Laro, Hector Garcia, a/k/a "Jabao", Pedro Pizzarro, a/k/a "Bolin", and Marilyn Montalvo, a/k/a "Ramona Munoz", Defendants. No. S 90 Civ. 15 (RPP).
United States v. Munozpublic domain
736 F.Supp. 502 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Miguel MUNOZ, a/k/a "Beeper", Rodolfo Rodriguez, Enrique Houellemont, a/k/a "Ereppa", Daniel Bretton, a/k/a "Raoul", Cristo Rey Ramirez-Pena, a/k/a "Bacalao", Victor Alberto Gil, a/k/a "Vitico", Nelson Omar Tabar-Laro, Hector Garcia, a/k/a "Jabao", Pedro Pizzarro, a/k/a "Bolin", and Marilyn Montalvo, a/k/a "Ramona Munoz", Defendants. No. S 90 Civ. 15 (RPP).
Meszaros v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: In July 2008, a federal jury found Steven Meszaros (hereinafter, “Meszaros”) guilty of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. On April 22, 2009, this Court sentenced Meszaros to a prison term of 151 months. Meszaros, who remains incarcerated, moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence. This Court ordered an
United States v. Virginio Martinezpublic domain
OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Virginio Hernandez Martinez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. At sentencing, the district court applied an eight-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(2)(B) of the 2016 United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”).
United States v. Bohannonpublic domain
RULING RE: MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (Doc. No. 134) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is defendant Jonathan Bohannon’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. No. 134). Bohannon argues that the government’s search óf Shonsai Dickson’s car and apartment — the apartment at which he was staying when he was arrested — viol
United States v. Luceropublic domain
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Lawrence Lucero pled guilty to three counts of receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(2), 2252(b)(1), and 2256, and two counts of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(4)(B), 2252(b)(2), and 2256. At sentencing, the district court increased Mr. Lucero’s offense level by
United States v. Amayapublic domain
SENTENCING OPINION AND STATEMENT OF REASONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION........................................................899 A. The Charges........................................................899 B. The Trials.........................................