Cases

AMENDED ORDER ADDRESSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ENFORCE PLEA AGREEMENT DAVID SAM, Senior District Judge. 1Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, In the Alternative, To Enforce Plea Agreement. The basis for this motion is Defendants’ claim that a plea agreement was reached between the Defendants and the government, that this a

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. Leslie D. Mower was convicted on one count of conspiracy and six counts of tax evasion for tax years 1992-1997. She was sentenced to twenty-seven months imprisonment and thirty-six months of supervised release. We affirmed her conviction and sentence on direct appeal.

351 F.Supp.2d 1225 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Thomas E. MOWER, Leslie D. Mower, James Thompson, Defendants. No. 2:02 CR 787 DAK. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. January 10, 2005. *1226 Kevin M. Downing, Esq., Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Robert S. Campbe

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. *116Same case below, 340 Fed. Appx. 515.

*617 Memorandum Decision TOOMEY, Judge: ¶1 Thomas Mower appeals the district court’s dismissal of his suit against Richard McBride Nibley, a resident of Japan, for lack of general personal jurisdiction. Mower sought compensatory and punitive damages for the destruction of thousands of

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 The law isn't good-for-nothing when a therapist causes a child to falsely accuse a parent of sexual abuse. ¶ 2 In March 2011, Thomas Mower's now ex-wife, Lidia Mower, began taking their four-year-old daughter, T.M., to The Children's Center for therapy. The Children

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1933 ___________________________ Geronimo DeLuna lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant The State of Minnesota, Department of Human Services lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION THORNE, Judge: T1 Leslie D. Mower; LD SQ, LLC; LD III, LLC; LD Purpose, LLC; and Navona, *1079 LC (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court's dismissal of several of their numerous causes of action against David R.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REHEARING NO. 03-14-00094-CR William Albert Mower, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 13-1008-K26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, District Judge. I. Introduction This Opinion and Order resolves the many outstanding pretrial motions filed in this matter by Defendants Jason Washington, Lisa Fleming, and Steven Sann. The three are charged, along with four other co-defendants, with offenses related to the manufacture and distribution of marijuana. Defendant Washington also faces a gun c

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * NEIL M. GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. Back in 2006 TruGreen managers felt betrayed when a handful of employees left to work for a rival lawn care company. TruGreen sued, charging, its former employees with breaching their employment contracts. In the end, the company lost that claim

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES & COSTS BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge. The plaintiff TruGreen Companies, L.L.C. (“TruGreen”) commenced the above-captioned action on February 8, 2006, alleging a number of claims against the defendants, including a number of former TruGreen employees, for breach of employment contracts, tortious interference with contract and with economi

PER CURIAM. In a three count indictment appellant was charged with violation of the National Firearms Act. He was tried on two of the counts, found guilty and has appealed from the judgment of conviction. 1

ACCEPTED 03-14-00094-CR 4748960 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/2/2015 2:5

BY THE COURT: On January 25,1979, the Consumer Product Safety Commission met to consider issuing consumer product safety standards for walk-behind power lawn mowers under 15 U.S.C. §§ 2057, 2058. Although the Commission voted its approval of the standards, it decided that the final, redrafted document would be signed at a subsequent meeting and that the standards would be promulgated ten days after their publication in the Federal Regis

218 B.R. 247 (1998) In re FRIED GROUP, INC., d/b/a Sundance Tractor & Mower, Debtor. HOLDEN MACHINERY, Movant, v. SUNDANCE TRACTOR & MOWER, Respondent. Bankruptcy No. 96-53971. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. January 16, 1998. *248 Wesley J. Boyer, Macon, GA, for Movant. Ward Stone

(2008) NEWAYS INC., Plaintiff, v. THOMAS ELWIN MOWER, SR., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 2:07-CV-0339 BSJ. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. February 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge. On January 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, 2008, this matter came on for hearing on New

600 F.2d 12 SOUTHLAND MOWER COMPANY, Yazoo Manufacturing Company, Inc.,and Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, Inc., Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, Respondent. Nos. 79-1203, 79-1295 and 79-1469. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 18, 1979. Dunaway, McCarthy &

People v Mower (2025 NY Slip Op 05851) People v Mower 2025 NY Slip Op 05851 Decided on October 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrect