⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Mosier”

Mosier v. Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 453; 190 L. Ed. 2d 342; 83 U.S.L.W. 3266; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7336
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 64 F. App'x 206
PER CURIAM. Harry T. Mosier petitions this court to review the dismissal of his appeal by the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board). Because the Board properly determined it lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Mosier’s appeal, this court affirms. I. Mr. Mosier was a Postmaster with the United States Postal Service (USPS) in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Following a congressional inquiry p
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 401 B.R. 487; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 279; 103 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1016; 2009 WL 448188
401 B.R. 487 (2009) In re Janerae F. SMITH, Debtor. Janerae F. Smith, Appellant, v. R. Kimball Mosier, Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. 07-065. Bankruptcy No. 06-24973. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. February 24, 2009. Submitted on the briefs:[*] *488 David L. Miller, Layton, UT, fo
State v. Mosierpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-09-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 4417
[Cite as State v. Mosier, 2025-Ohio-4417.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-P-0080 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas SCOTT M. MOSIER,
Supreme Court of the United States · 1996-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 116 S. Ct. 1848; 517 U.S. 1220; 134 L. Ed. 2d 949; 64 U.S.L.W. 3793; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3444
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mosier v. Mosierpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-07-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2013 Ohio 3024
[Cite as Mosier v. Mosier, 2013-Ohio-3024.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DONNA E. MOSIER JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Craig R
Mosier v. Reynoldspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 895
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1996-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 517 U.S. 1220
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1996-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 517 U.S. 1220
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mosier v. Williamspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 502 U.S. 989; 112 S. Ct. 602
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mosier v. Williamspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 502 U.S. 989
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2024-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 05-AUG-2024 08:16 AM Dkt. 52 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-01-09 · Published · cited 42× · 90 F.4th 541
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0008p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TIMMY LEE MOSIER, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006-03-16 · Published · cited 2× · 339 B.R. 194; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 945; 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 54; 2006 WL 650004
339 B.R. 194 (2006) In re MANSFIELD CORPORATION, a Utah Corporation, Mansfield Trust, a California Business Trust, and Mansfield Viatical Management, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtors. R. Kimball Mosier, Trustee of the Substantively Consolidated Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estates of Mansfield Corporation, Mansfield Trust, and Mansfield Viatical Management, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Cargill Financial Services Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Def
Hutson v. Mosierpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
No. 117,020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS MARCIA HUTSON, Appellant, v. SUSAN MOSIER, M.D., in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Appellee.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 895; 62 U.S.L.W. 3251
510 U.S. 895 Mosierv.Reynolds, Warden, et al. No. 93-5482. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 1993. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 9
Marie v. Mosierpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2016-07-22 · Published · cited 11× · 196 F. Supp. 3d 1202; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96245; 2016 WL 3951744
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge In an earlier Order, the court decided to defer the decision whether to grant plaintiffs’ request for permanent injunctive relief. See Doc. 126 at 32. The court now has considered the parties’ additional submissions and is prepared to rule on that issue. For reasons expl
Mosier v. Lockhartpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 895
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mosier v. Lockhartpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 895; 110 S. Ct. 245
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marie v. Mosierpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2015-08-10 · Published · cited 1× · 122 F. Supp. 3d 1085; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105120; 2015 WL 4724389
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DANIEL D. CRABTREE, District Judge. Six weeks ago, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the United States Supreme Court ruled' that state laws banning same-sex marriage violate due process and equal protection rights guaranteed by our Constitution.1 Given this ruling, one might ask whether there is any work left to do in this lawsuit, one challengi