Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, PICTON, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jeffrey W. MORRIS Aviation Ordnanceman Petty Officer F

Case: 20-30744 Document: 00516392733 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2022

United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Aaron J. MORRIS Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800289 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 27 March 201

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 15, 2021 Decided July 13, 2021 No. 19-3094 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. MORRIS GEMAL JOHNSON, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:15-cr-00125-1)

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1512 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Morris Devon Brown

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 15, 2021 Decided July 13, 2021 No. 19-3094 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. MORRIS GEMAL JOHNSON, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:15-cr-00125-1)

CCA 20160379. Appellee’s motion to file a 10-day letter out of time is denied.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jonathan Morris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record refle

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Byron Morris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morris has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record re

HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge. After Abraham Morris pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute twenty-eight grams or more of cocaine base, the district court sentenced him as a career offender to 190 months’ imprisonment. Morris appeals, asserting that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court did not affirmatively solicit argument regarding Morris’s objections to his Pre-Sen

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, A.C. RUGH, S.A. DOMINGUEZ Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLAS R. MORRIS CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201500280 SPECIA

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas Edward Morris appeals the district court’s order denying a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Morris’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district cou

OPINION AND ORDER Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In 2014, Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines revised the *1350guidelines applicable to the drug-trafficking offense for. which this court-sentenced defendant Rasheek Morris. The Sentencing Commission simultaneously promulgated Amendment 788, making Amendment 782 r

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: We REVERSE the district court’s decision to grant Defendant-Appellee Morris Wise’s motion to suppress. Wise was traveling on a Greyhound bus when police officers performed a bus interdiction at a Conroe, Texas bus stop. Officers boarded the Greyhound, and Wise aroused an officer’s suspicion

SOUTER, Associate Justice. Federal law mandates a minimum ten-year prison sentence for a convicted mem-. ber of a drug conspiracy responsible for more than 280 grams of crack. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A)(iii); 846. So far as it matters to this appeal, the district court made a finding of drug quantity, by a preponderance of the evidence: that the admitted conspirator Ryan Morris w

CCA 201300348. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement .to the petition for grant of review granted to December 29,2014.

CCA 201300348. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, but only up to and including January 13, 2015.

CCA 201300348. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine *267Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue: DOES IMAGE 106470 IN PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 2 CONSTITUTE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY UNDER UNITED STATES v. WARNER, 73 M.J. 1 (C.A.A.F. 2013)?

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Chad Lee Morris’s Motion to Suppress [Doc. # 15]. Defendant Chad Lee Morris (“Defendant”) is under indictment for one count of receiving child pornography and one count of distributing child pornography, both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A). On February 12, 2014, Defendant moved

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, J. R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY F. MORRIS SONAR TECHNICIAN (SUBMARINE) SEAMAN (E -3), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 2