Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700165 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. PATRICK T. MOON Sonar Technician (Surface) Seaman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 17, 2025 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, Vv. MALACHI MATHIAS MOON SEALS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 24-1028 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (D.C. No. 1:22-CR-00245-CNS-1) Jacob R. Rasch-Chabot, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Virginia L. Grady Federal Public Defender,

Appellate Case: 24-1028 Document: 75 Date Filed: 01/22/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 22, 2026

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellant Terrance Moon challenges his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), on numerous eviden-tiary grounds. He also challenges his sen *140 tence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). Finding no

Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant was convicted, inter alia, of possessing images of “nude minors and persons appealing to be nude minors,” in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2012). The ease was submitted to this Court on its merits, and we specified two issues for review to determine (1) whether Appellant had fair notice that the char

CCA 20120112. Appellee’s motion for leave to file a supplemental joint appendix is granted.

CCA 20120112. On further consideration of the above-captioned case and this Court’s Order dated 10 July, 2013, it is ordered that briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

CCA 20120112. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file a brief and a joint appendix granted, but only up to and including February 6, 2014, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

MEMORANDUM ** Bobby V. Moon appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of sexually explicit images of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Moon contends that the district court erred by applying a five-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D

513 F.3d 527 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Young MOON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-5581. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 24, 2007. Decided and Filed: January 16, 2008. *528 *529 *530

MEMORANDUM ** Bobby V. Moon appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of sexually explicit images of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Moon contends that the district court erred by applying a five-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D

512 F.3d 359 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George MOON and Anthony Alexander, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 05-4506, 06-1840. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 13, 2007. Decided January 3, 2008. *360 Daniel L. Bella (argued), Office of the United States Atto

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0031p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appel

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 05-4506 & 06-1840 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GEORGE MOON and ANTHONY ALEXANDER, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis

181 F.Supp.2d 596 (2002) Jamal Antwan MOON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. CIV.2:01-CV-432, No. CRIM.2:99cr203. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. January 15, 2002. *597 Darryl J. Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for USA. Jamal Antwan Moon, Peter

PER CURIAM. Jamal Antwan Moon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motion for enlargement of the record, deny the motion for leave to take deposition, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the di

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7209 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RICHARD CRAIG MOON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:06-cr-00638-TMC-1) Argued: March 8, 20

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Moon H. Kim (Kim) was one of three co-owners of a corporation that failed to pay federal employee withholding taxes during certain segments of the years 1989 to 1991. Kim was assessed a penalty by the IRS and he refused to pay the same, forcing the government to commence this civil action to reduce the assessment to a judgment. In its complaint

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.