Cases

*2188Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Judges SILVERMAN, GOULD and CALLAHAN: I agree with and join Parts I-IV of the majority opinion explaining why we should reverse our prior ruling in Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). However, I respectfully dissent from the balance of the opinion appl

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 86.

594 F.3d 1080 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 3, 2010. Mark R. Rehe, U.S. Attorney, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Vincent James Brunkow, Esquire, Assistant Appellate S

MEMORANDUM * Guillermo Aguila-Montes De Oca (“Aguila-Montes”) appeals his conviction for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (attempted entry into the United States following deportation), and his 120-month sentence. He argues that his conviction should be reversed because the district court erroneously admitted several items of evidence at trial. He challenges his sentence on the

553 F.3d 1229 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo AGUILA-MONTES de OCA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued February 9, 2006. Submitted February 29, 2008. Filed January 20, 2009. *1231 Vincent J. Brunkow, Steven F.

523 F.3d 1071 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-50170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued February 9, 2006. Submitted February 29, 2008. Filed April 28, 2008. *1072 Vincent J. Brunkow, San Diego,

PER CURIAM: * Rafael Montes de Oca appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute more than 5 grams of cocaine base (crack cocaine). He argues that the sentencing provision of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Montes de Oca concedes that his argument

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-50170 v.  D.C. No. CR-04-02175-RTB GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the U

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-50170 v.  D.C. No. CR-04-02175-RTB GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. 

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50170 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-04-02175-RTB GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE ORDER AND OCA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 05-50170 v.  D.C. No. CR-04-02175-RTB GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the U

NUMBER 13-14-00289-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. RAUL FERNANDO MONTES DE OCA, Appellee. On appeal from the 445th District Court of C

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 13, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00910-CR EX PARTE ERIK MONTES DE OCA-OROZCO, Appellant On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1249272-A MEMORANDUM OPINION This

(2008) Winston MENDEZ MONTES DE OCA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADVENTIS PHARMA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-2608 (RLA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 30, 2008. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RAYMOND L. ACOSTA, District Judge. Defendant AVENTIS PHARMACETICALS, INC. ("AVENTIS") has move

*1878Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00668-CV 5147224 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

TSOUCALAS, Judge. Defendant-appellant Mahir Reiss appeals from his sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Jack B. Wein-stein, Judge) following his plea of guilty to a money-laundering charge. Specifically, Reiss claims that the district court erred in its calculation and imposition of a $6.3 million fíne. Reiss further argues that he is entitled to be resentenced pursuant to

186 F.3d 149 (2nd Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.MAHIR REISS, ALSO KNOWN AS BARBITAS, ALSO KNOWN AS BARBAS, ALSO KNOWN AS UNCLE, ALSO KNOWN AS THE RABBI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,ABRAHAM REISS, BERNARD GRUNFELD, JACK PINSKI, ROBERTO BUENDIA, FABIO ARANA, LISANDRO MONTES DE OCA, FRANCISCO GIL, ESTONIO RODRIGUEZ, JUAN SUAREZ, ALVARO DUQUE, AND ISRAEL KNOBLOCH, DEFENDANTS.

413 F.2d 543 Ramiro DE LA FE; Armando Betancourt; Modesto Carlos GarciaMendez; Humberto Perez Montes De Oca; ManuelAlvarez-Solano; Sergio Cipri BruceFreijo y De Bedia, a/k/aCarlosSalgado-Suarez, Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 25792. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. July 23, 1969.