Cases

UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202100342 Appellee Panel 2 v. ORDER Adam N. MONTGOMERY Chief Electronics Technician Granting Appellant’s Motion (Nuclear Power) (E-7) U.S. Navy to Withdraw Case from A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-46 (RDM) PATRICK MONTGOMERY, BRADY KNOWLTON, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants Patrick Montgomery and Brady Knowlton are charged in a ten-count indictment with various crimes related to the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2604 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Montgomery Lebeau, l

The Governor shall appoint and fix the compensation of such number of deputy heads of administrative departments, except those of the Department of Auditor General and Treasury Department, as the Executive Board shall approve, who shall, in the absence of the head of such department, have the right to exercise all the powers and perform all the duties by law vested in and imposed upon the head of such department, except the power t

TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause comes before the Court following petitioner's motion to commit respondent, Kevin Montgomery, as a sexually dangerous person pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, 18 U.S.C. § 4248. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds th

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS FIREARM AND STATEMENTS PAUL D. BORMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Jesse Montgomery is charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. On July 19, 2016, Defendant filed. a Motion to Suppress the firearm seized from him, and certain statements made by him to the arresting officers. (ECF No. 25, Mot. to Suppress), On August 23, 2016, the Gov

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth M. Montgomery, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3682(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence. A district court’s decision on whether to reduce a sentence under § 3682(c)(2) is reviewed for abuse of discretion, while its c

ORDER After Thomas Montgomery led police on a car chase, a police dog discovered him hiding in a backyard near his discarded gun, with his car parked out front. Mont*595gomery pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced to 66 months’ imprisonment. Montgomery filed a notice of appeal, but his appoi

*806ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THE “SPECIAL FINDINGS” FROM THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT, AND TO STRIKE THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE IT FAILS TO ADEQUATELY NARROW DEFENDANT’S ELIGIBILITY FOR THE DEATH PENALTY, MEET HEIGHTENED STANDARDS OF RELIABILITY, IS VAGUE AND DUPLICATIVE AND OVERLY BROAD (ECF NO. 141); DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE STATUTORY AGGRAVATOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal Case No. 05-67 (RWR) ) VERNON MONTGOMERY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM ORDE

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CARLOS MURGUIA, District Judge. This appeal arises from a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas granting debtors James and Sapora Montgomery’s objection to the priority claim of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and determining the interest rate on the claim. Debtors do not appeal the determination as to the interest rate, but the IRS appeals the deci

CCA 37556. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to November 2, 2011.

CCA 37556. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.* It is directed that the promulgating order be corrected to reflect that the drug used in Specification 13 of Cha

635 F.3d 1074 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lisa M. MONTGOMERY, Appellant. No. 08-1780. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 22, 2010. Filed: April 5, 2011. *1078 Frederick A. Duchardt, Jr., Trimble, MO, argued (John G. Gromowsky, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for

621 F.3d 568 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McCellon MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3289. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Decided and Filed September 13, 2010. *570 ON BRIEF: Kevin M. Schad, Federal Public Defender's Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Robyn Jones Hahnert, Kev

676 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Daniel MONTGOMERY, Defendant. Criminal Action No. 03-20127-KHV. Civil Action No. 08-2318. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 13, 2009. *1220 Leon J. Patton, Sheri P. McCracken, Office of United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff.

*886Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we a

*886Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Montgomery appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we a

OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. Appellant Phillip Montgomery, a former police officer, was convicted by a jury of deprivation of civil rights, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and one substantive count of obstruction of justice. The District Court sentenced Montgomery to 24 months’ imprisonment.1 We are not persuaded by Montgomery’s arguments for reversal, and will affirm.

OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. Appellant Phillip Montgomery, a former police officer, was convicted by a jury of deprivation of civil rights, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and one substantive count of obstruction of justice. The District Court sentenced Montgomery to 24 months’ imprisonment.1 We are not persuaded by Montgomery’s arguments for reversal, and will affirm.