Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Modeste”
Modeste v. Floridapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
State v. Modestepublic domain
66 So.3d 386 (2011) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Joseph MODESTE, Appellee. No. 5D07-2010. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 29, 2011. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Frank J. Bankowitz of Frank J. Bankowitz, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. <
Modeste v. Statepublic domain
28 So.3d 179 (2010) Alvin MODESTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D08-3658. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 17, 2010. *181 Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahas
State v. Modestepublic domain
987 So.2d 787 (2008) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Joseph MODESTE, Appellee. No. 5D07-2010. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 8, 2008. *788 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Frank J. Bankowitz of Frank J. Ban
Modeste v. Hornpublic domain
499 F.Supp.2d 272 (2007) Ronald MODESTE, Petitioner, v. Martin F. HORN, Commissioner, New York City Department of Probation and Andrew Cuomo,[1] Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondents. No. 06-CV-4584 (SJF). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 3, 2007. *273 *
Modeste v. Tesla, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES A. MODESTE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-cv-2177 (CRC) TESLA, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Nationwide claims to be on your side. Yet Plaintiff says it was not on his. After Plaintiff was seriously injured
People v. Modestepublic domain
*316OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Leventhae, J. This decision explains the court’s ruling during trial that neither the People nor the defendant were entitled to a missing witness instruction as to the complainant.1 On February 2, 2002, the defendant stabbed her boyfriend in the neck with a knife. The def
Eveready Insurance v. Modestepublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.H.O.), dated May 17, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. By order dated December 19, 2003, the Supreme Court temporarily stayed arbitration of the s
Philip M. Modeste v. Department of Veterans Affairspublic domain
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 44 Docket No. AT-3330-13-0146-I-1 Philip M. Modeste, Appellant, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.
Philip M. Modeste v. Department of Veterans Affairspublic domain
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 44 Docket No. AT-3330-13-0146-I-1 Philip M. Modeste, Appellant, v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.
People v. Modestepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph G. Golia, J. A combined Mapp/Wade/Huntley hearing was held on the within two cases consolidated for such purpose. The hearings commenced on April 15, 1993 and continued on April 16, April 20, April 21, May 3, and concluded on May 4,1993. The People presented Police Officer Jose Alvarez, Detective Walter Panchyn, Detective Manuel Gomez, and Juan Montill
Rutherford v. United Statespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Fernandez v. United Statespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Bowe v. United Statespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Proctor v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims HELEN PROCTOR, Plaintiff, No. 23-cv-2077 v. (Filed: July 31, 2025) THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Julius D. Kearney, Sr., Kearney Law Offices, Pine Bluff, AR, for Plaintiff. Isabelle Aubrun, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington,
United States v. Guanghuapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 23-091-2 (CKK) JIN GUANGHUA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 19, 2025) Defendant Jin Guanghua faces a twelve-count indictment charging him with participation in a bank-fraud, sa
Brown v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-CM-0020 KEVIN MICHAEL BROWN, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES
United States v. Abbottpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23 - 1555 (LLA) JAMES T. ABBOTT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff United States of America seeks a civil penalty of $40,000 from Defendant James T. Abbott for his failure
United States v. Martinpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, v. MATTHEW MARTIN, Case No. 1:21-cr-00394-TNM Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Defendant Matthew Martin faced misdemeanor charges relating to the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. He was arrested, tried, and acquitted of al
BIRDBEAR v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) ROGER BIRDBEAR, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 16-75L v. ) (Filed: August 14, 2025) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,