Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Moayedi”
Moayedi v. US Customs and Border Protectionpublic domain
510 F.Supp.2d 73 (2007) Sina MOAYEDI; Plaintiff, v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1082 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 11, 2007. *74 *75 *76 Eric Robert Stanco, Valerie Elizabeth Powe
Justice WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court. This dispute asks whether a party waives the statutory right of offset under section 51.003(c) of the Property Code by agreeing to a general waiver of defenses in a guaranty agreement. The court of appeals answered yes, holding that section 51.003 creates an affirmative defense and that the guaranty agreemen
Behrman v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is United States of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Jock Sivakumar (Dkt. #27). The Court, having considered the relevant pleadings, finds that the motion should be granted. BACKGROUND This is a tax refund suit brought by Plaintiff, Brian Behrman (“Behrma
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER and RAPID DEFENSE NETWORK, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-2153-RCL UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Transgender Law Center (TLC) and Rapid Defense Network (RDN) bring this Freedo
Clay v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
680 F.Supp.2d 239 (2010) Lewis Nathaniel CLAY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-0179 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 29, 2010. *242 Lewis Nathaniel Clay, Coleman II, Coleman, FL, for Plaintiff. Jennifer M. Olkiewicz, U.S. Attorney's
Clay v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LEWIS NATHANIEL CLAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-0179 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES ) DEPARTMENT OF JUST
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00650-CV Texas Right to Life and John Seago, Appellants v. Allison Van Stean; Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health; Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Bhavik Kumar, M.D; North Texas Equal Access Fund; Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, Inc.;
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0468 ══════════ Texas Right to Life and John Seago, Petitioners, v. Allison Van Stean; Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health; Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Bhavik Kumar, M.D.; North Texas Equ
J. Kyle Bass v. United Development Funding, L.P.public domain
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 21, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00752-CV J. KYLE BASS, ET AL., Appellants V. UNITED DEVELOPMENT FUNDING, L.P., ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
Lewis v. Executive Office for United State Attorneyspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge. The plaintiff brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2010), for the release of information maintained by components of the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”). The Court granted in part and denied in part without prejudice the DOJ’s first mot
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REMAND NO. 03-21-00650-CV Texas Right to Life and John Seago, Appellants v. Allison Van Stean; Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services; Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Bhavik Kumar, M.D; North Texas E
MORRIS, Judge. The appellants—the borrowers and guarantors of a commercial real estate loan—appeal a final judgment entered in favor of the lender, SLVIV Lending, L.P. The trial court concluded that the parties agreed to apply Texas law to the lender’s claim for deficiency and that under Texas law, the appellants waived their right to challenge the amount of the deficiency. We agr
Opinion issued April 30, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00720-CV ——————————— CG RANCH SERVICES, LLC, Appellant V. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Appellee
Stonehill v. Central Intelligence Agencypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PATRICK LENZ, Co-Executor of the Estate of Harry S. Stonehill, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-3327-RCL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Patrick Lenz is the co-executor of the estate of the late Harry S. Stonehill. He seeks discl
Dupre v. Transcon. Gas Pipe Line, LLCpublic domain
CHUTZ, J. *189Third-party plaintiff, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco), appeals the trial court's judgment, dismissing without prejudice its third-party demand for declaratory relief against third-party defendant, The Gray Insurance Company (Gray). We maintain the appeal and reverse and remand. FAC
Michael Scott Nix v. City of Beaumont, Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-18-00407-CV __________________ MICHAEL SCOTT NIX, Appellant V. CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 13-0597 444444444444 PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. TORCH ENERGY ADVISORS INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION F
Stonehill v. Central Intelligence Agencypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PATRICK LENZ, Co-Executor of the Estate of Harry S. Stonehill, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-3327-RCL CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2018, Pauline Dale Stonehill, acting as co-executor and co-administrator of the estate of he
Iqbal Akhtar v. Leawood HOA, Inc.public domain
OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice Leawood HOA, Inc. (“Leawood”), the homeowners’ association for Leawood Condominiums, sued Iqbal Akhtar, owner of several Leawood Condominiums units, in justice court after Akhtar failed to pay an assessment for repairs of the property. The justice of the peace conducted a bench trial and found Akhtar liable. Akhtar appealed to
State Bank of Texas v. Granbury Hospitality, Inc.public domain
Reverse and Remand and Opinion Filed November 20, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01306-CV STATE BANK OF TEXAS, Appellant V. GRANBURY HOSPITALITY, INC., SEVILLE PLAZA HOSPITALITY, INC., CANYON COUNTRY HOSPITALITY, INC., MOVHA INVESTMENTS, INC., KIRIT BHAKTA, AJ