Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action No. 21-508 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell LUKE WESSLEY BENDER, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are defendants Luke Wessl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 23-CR-176 (JMC) v. CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Christopher Mitchell is charged in a six-count indictment alleging unlawful possession of a

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1388 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. AKEEM CRUZ, a/k/a Vybe, a/k/a Mello, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Jon D. Levy, U.S. District Judge] Nos. 21-142

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6167 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 11 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-6167 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MITCHELL SWAIN, Defendant -

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Steven K. MITCHELL Gunnery Sergeant (E-7), U.S. Marine Corps

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Crim. No. 05-00110 (EGS) VERNARD A. MITCHELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Vernard A. Mitchell (“Mr. Mitchell”) moves to reduce his sentence pursuant to Section 404(b) of the First Step Act, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (20

Case: 24-60607 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED No. 24-60607 Novemb

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600327 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. GARRY W. MITCHELL Aviation Electronics Technician Second Class (E -5), United States Navy

Chief Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. We address today the Fifth Amendment limits on asking a suspect to unlock his phone when the device has been seized pursuant to a valid search and seizure authorization.1 Because Appellee had previously invoked his right to counsel, we hold that the Government violated his Fifth Amendment rights as protected by Edwards v.

CCA 20160776 DAILY JOURNAL Notice—In Re October 2017 Term of Court Article '142 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 942 (2012), authorizes the appointment of five judges to serve on the Court.- One of the positions is vacant. Unless the Court issues a notice that a senior judge or an Article III judge will perform judicial duties, the four judges in active service will perform the f

CCA 20150776. On consideration of the motion filed by Professor Jimmy Gurulé to appear pro hac vice as counsel of record for amicus curiae Sean Patrick Flynn and Alyssa Hughes, motion to submit oral argument by Notre Dame law Students in support of Appellant, and motion to submit a corrected amicus curiae brief, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted, and that amicus curiae will be allotted 10 minutes to present oral a

CCA 20150776. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to stay the trial proceedings, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted. The trial proceedings are hereby stayed pending further order of the Court.

CCA 20150776. On consideration of the motion filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union, and ACLU of the District of Columbia for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in support of Appellee, and the motions filed by Jamie L. Williams and Brett Max Kauffman to appear pro hac vice, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.

CCA 20150776. On consideration of the motion filed by Professor Stephen F. Smith to appear pro hac vice as counsel of record for amicus curiae Dominic Barceleau, and motion to submit oral argument by student on behalf of Appellee, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted, and that amicus curiae will be allotted 10 minutes to present oral argument.

CCA 20150776. Appellee’s motion for an enlargement of time to file a brief is granted to January 18, 2017.

CCA 20150776. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file a reply brief granted to February 10, 2017.

CCA 20150776. In view of the Court’s selection of the above-captioned case to be heard as part of Project Outreach at Notre Dame Law School on April 4, 2017, the Court invites the filing of *128amicus curiae briefs in support of the Appellant and Appellee by eligible law students acting under supervising attorneys. See Rules 13A and 26(a)(2), Rules of Practice and Procedure. The briefs shall

CCA 20150776. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, and a supporting brief under Rule 22, together with a motion to stay trial proceedings were filed on this date on the following issues: I.WHETHER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT’S SELF-INCRIMINATION CLAUSE IS VI

CCA 20150776. Appellant’s motion for thirty minutes of argument is denied.

ORDER Corey Mitchell appeals his convictions for armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)®. He would like this court to consider his argument that armed bank robbery is no longer a crime of violence for purposes of § 924(c), in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U. - S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.E