Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2253 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ R. ANDINO-MORALES, Defendant, Appellant. No. 19-2262 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ D. FOLCH-COLÓN,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1622 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. MIRANDA-CARMONA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-1761 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JONATHAN FRANK MIRANDA-DÍAZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Gustavo A. Gelpí, U.S. District Judge]

MEMORANDUM** Salvador De Jesus Sanchez Miranda appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the time-served sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sanchez Miranda’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Be

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before D.C. KING, B.T. PALMER, T.P. BELSKY Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARLON E. MIRANDA, JR. CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201600103 SPECIAL

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. These causes came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and were argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the District Court’s judgments of conviction, denial of appellants’ motions to dismiss and for reconsideration, and acceptance of appellants’ guilty p

OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PÉREZ-GIMÉNEZ, District Judge. Defendant Bernis González Miranda was an officer in the Puerto Rico Department of Corrections. In the fall of 2010, the Defendant was arrested by the FBI as part of “Operation Guardshack,” a large-scale undercover investigation targeting corrupt law enforcement officers in Puerto Rico. González was charged with three c

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Defendant Alexis Miranda-Sotolongo challenges both his conviction and his sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). First, he argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the guns used to convict him, contending that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct the traffic stop that led to the discovery of the guns. We

ORDER Jesus Miranda-Camarena appealed his 34-month, within-guidelines sentence for drug trafficking as procedurally and substantively unreasonable. While the appeal was pending, he completed his term of imprisonment and was removed to Mexico. His lawyer and the government now contend that this appeal is moot, and we agree. Miranda-Camarena pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine as part of a

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Santos J. Miranda-Martinez (“Miranda”) appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to drug trafficking crimes. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the government breached the terms of his plea agreement, and because the district court erroneously imposed a two-level firearm enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Find

ORDER Ismael Miranda pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine and marijuana, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), after police discovered that he and a partner were selling wholesale quantities of drugs out of a storage unit in Elgin, Illinois. The district court sentenced Miranda to a total of 240 months’ imprisonment, below the guidelines range of 262 to 327

MEMORANDUM** David Miranda-Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his sentence of 37-months in prison and- one year supervised release for attempted re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Miranda-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds fo

666 F.3d 1280 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-11868 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 10, 2012. Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, Robert E. O'Neill, Tampa, FL, Robert Edward Bodnar, Jr., Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Stephen J. Langs, Donna L

CCA 201100084. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that the convening authority approved the sentence, which included a bad-conduct discharge, and then stated, In accordance with the UCMJ, Rules for Courts-Martial, applicable regulations, and this action, the sentence is ordered executed. Under Article 71(c)(1), UCMJ, a punitive discharge cannot be orde

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Jose Miranda appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm but remand to correct the judgment. Miranda contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider all of

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Salvador Mauricio Elias MIRANDA. No. 1:08CR241. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. December 3, 2008. ORDER T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. Defendant, Salvador Mauricio Elias Miranda, was convicted by a jury of two counts of making false statements to a grand jury inves

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Jose Miranda appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm but remand to correct the judgment. Miranda contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider all of

670 F.3d 661 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis MIRANDA-ORTEGON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-51129. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 10, 2012. *662 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Margaret Mary Embry, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Philip J. Lynch, Asst

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Emilio Miranda Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Miranda Ramirez has filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Miranda Ramirez’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

524 F.3d 840 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. German B. MIRANDA, Appellant. No. 08-1887. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 24, 2008. Filed: May 1, 2008. German B. Miranda, Forrest City, AR, pro se. Matthew Fleming, Christopher D. Plumlee, Charles E. Smith, US Attorney's Office, Western District of A