Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM. A jury convicted James Lee Milliner of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. He appeals the conviction, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the denial of his motion to suppress wiretap evidence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. In 2010 the Drug Enforcemen

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION John T. Laney, III, United States Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Avoid Judgment Lien (“Motion”) filed on February 4, 2016 by the Movant, the Debtor Patsy D. Milliner. In her Motion, the Debtor sought to avoid a judicial lien held by the Respondent, Action Motors, Inc. (“Action”), pursuant to section 522(f) of the Bankruptcy Code.1

*1297 ORDER KRISTI K..DuBOSE, District Judge. This action is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Chuck Milliner, plaintiff Marcus Johnson’s response in opposition, and defendant’s reply (docs. 26-29, 33-34, 37). Upon consideration, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Motion for Summary Judgment i

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge On July 27, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re: MSI Duty to Supervise Bock and Evans (“Pls.’ Mot.”) (ECF No. 41). After carefully considering the parties’ written and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plainti

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. The United States seized and sought forfeiture of the defendant (a 1990 Chevrolet Corvette convertible) pursuant to Title 21, U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), claiming that the Corvette was purchased with proceeds traceable to the sale of controlled substances. The government filed a complaint pursuant to Supplemental Rule C of the Federal Rules of Civi

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pn Defendant Bock Evans Financial Counsel’s motion to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiffs Charlotte B. Milliner, and .Joanne Brem. The Court has carefully considered the arguments of the parties in the papers submitted, and finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, pursuan

856 A.2d 616 (2004) Maurice MILLINE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 99-CF-1375. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 18, 2004. Decided August 26, 2004. *617 Lloyd Nolan, with whom James Klein and Jaclyn S. Frankfurt were on the brief, for appellant. Alexandra F. Foster, Assistant U

709 A.2d 417 (1998) William Gregory MILLINER, Appellant, v. G. David ENCK, Thomas Enck, John Enck, Individually and doing business as Enck Brothers Drywall, a Partnership, Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 4, 1998. Filed March 19, 1998. *418 Nina B. Shapiro, Lancaster, for appellant. John Flounlack

932 F.Supp. 345 (1996) Donna MILLINER, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 92-187 SSH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 8, 1996. *346 *347 John J. Jamnback, Boraks & Jamnback, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Jesse P. Goode, Assistan

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because this is a questionable exercise of the proper use of the power of the state to prosecute criminal offenders. There is no doubt that appellant committed a crime and should be punished, but the issue is the state's calculated disregard to prosecute for the crime that was actually committed, and a subsequent punishment that does not fit the crime. It is disturbing that the majority has seen fit to look the other way and endorse this blatan

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

947 F.2d 1490 Millinerv.Gilbert*** NO. 91-3306 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. OCT 15, 1991 1 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. 2 AFFIRMED.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-CF-1132 LANDON R. MAYO, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, A

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CO-330 UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, v. MONTERO KYLE, APPELLE

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. This is a criminal case in which the defendant Woodrow W. Bennett has been charged with entering into and engaging in a combination and conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of interstate trade and commerce, in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1). Defendant is charged with engaging in a conspiracy to submit collusive and rig

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3816 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Eric Deangelo Griggs, also known as E.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1368 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Marshaun Jordan Merrett, also known as Sheez lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 20-2081 ___________________________ United State

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.