Cases

FILED MEMORANDUM DECISION 08/28/2017, 10:06 am CLERK Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals Memorandum Decisio

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants Daniel George Renteria, Alex Garcia, Jr., and Miguel Angel Ordaz were found guilty of various counts relating to a drug conspiracy in northern Wyoming and California. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. Background Information compiled by la

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Tzunux-Ruiz appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 70-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in vio*657lation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Tzunux-Ruiz’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Angel Garcia-Amesquita appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for re-entry after deporta*683tion, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Amesquita’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for rel

473 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jose Miguel BATTLE, Jr., et. al., Defendants. No. 04 20159 CR GOLD, 04 20159 CR BANDSTRA. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 16, 2006. *1186 *1187 *1188 *1189

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

Case: 24-50784 Document: 88-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50784 FILED

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Appellants Miguel Zelaya, Luis Ordonez-Vega, Jorge Sosa, and William Gavidia were each convicted of participating in a racketeering conspiracy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d

587 F.3d 283 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ariel MENCHACA-CASTRUITA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-40403. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 29, 2009. *285 Amy Howell Alaniz (argued), McAllen, TX, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for U.S. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed.

327 F.Supp.2d 79 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Steven D. MUEFFELMAN, Defendant. United States of America, v. Issa M. Jaber, Defendant. United States of America, v. Michael S. Notkin, Defendant. United States of America, v. Carmelo Rodriguez, Defendant. CRIM. Nos. 01-CR-10387-NG, CRIM. 02-CR-10201-NG, CRIM. 03-CR-10310-NG, CRIM. 04-CR-10048-NG. United States Dis

40 F.Supp.2d 1302 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James BAHE, Sr., Defendant. No. 95-421-MV. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. November 25, 1998. Ann Steinmetz, John V. Butcher, Federal Public Defender's Office, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant. Tara C. Neda, Kathleen Bliss, U.S. Attorney's Office, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. <

REVISED, May 26, 1998 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 97-20130 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN GARCIA ABREGO, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________

KING, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Juan Garcia Abrego appeals his conviction and sentence for ten counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), five counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(A)(i); three counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), one count of co

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. This case presents the consolidated appeals of eight Defendants who were charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana and were convicted of a variety of federal narcotics offenses. Defendants on appeal raise challenges to their convictions and sentences. We affirm. I. Factual Background T

810 F.2d 879 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hector ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 83-5208. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 7, 1986.Decided Feb. 17, 1987.As Amended Feb. 17, 1987. Allan Ides, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

470 F.Supp. 384 (1979) UNITED STATES of America v. William Alford MAY MAY, Roger Cotera Cali, Abel Castellon Elles, Juan Cordoba Evangelista, Leonel Gaspar Angulo-Quinones. Crim. Nos. B-78-501, H-79-38. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Brownsville Division. March 16, 1979. *385 *386

COLEMAN, Chief Judge. In company with Sylvia Coronado and Alvin Valinzuela, Ralph Medina Arce, Tony Coronado, and Carlos Roque Pina were convicted of (1) conspiracy to knowingly possess stolen mail; (2) aiding and abetting possession of a stolen check which had been mailed to Miguel Hernandez; (3) aiding and abetting possession of a stolen check which had been mailed to Tomas Va

168 U.S. 66 (1897) BERGERE v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. BERGERE. Nos. 43, 46. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 19, 1897. Decided October 18, 1897. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. *67 Mr. J.D. O'Bryan and Mr. James W. Vroom for Bergere and others. Mr. T

67 U.S. 17 (____) 2 Black 17 THE UNITED STATES v. ANDRES CASTILLERO. ANDRES CASTILLERO v. THE UNITED STATES. Supreme Court of United States. *84 Mr. Archibald C. Peachy, of California, Mr. Charles O'Conor, of New York, and Mr. Reverdy Johnson, of Maryland, for claimant. Mr. Black, of Pennsylvania, and M