Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 01-4674 PAUL DAMERON MIDGETT, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Tho

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 05-5263 PAUL DAMERON MIDGETT, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, S

Filed: December 3, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4206 (CR-98-133) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Thomas Lee Midgett, III, Defendant - Appellant.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge GREGORY joined. OPINION KING, Circuit Judge. Paul Dameron Midgett appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial in the Western District of North Carolina, for the offenses of malicious damage to

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge TROXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge GREGORY joined. *322 OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: In November 2000, Paul Dameron Mid-gett was convicted of damaging a vehicle by means of fire and i

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge SEYMOUR joined. OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge: Thomas Lee Midgett, III (“Midgett”) entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a person previously committed to a mental institution, see 18 U.S.

OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge: William Michael Midgett appeals from a judgment of conviction and the imposition of a sixty-three-month sentence after a jury convicted him of two counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count of maintaining a place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributin

[Cite as State v. Midgett, 2021-Ohio-2317.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

SMITH, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This military benefits case, before us on the parties’ motions for summary judgment, presents a novel and difficult issue of the preclusive effect of a state court in rem judgment on the administrative determinations of the United States Army. It might well be subtitled, "The Battle of the Presumptions.” Inasmuch as the parties have provided t

FILED Nov 26, 2019 03:20 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS Trt TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT COOKEVILLE HOPE BOTTOMS, ) Docket No. 2017-04-0253 Employee, ) V. ) State File No. 58577-2017 ) ROY MIDGETT d/b/a MIDGETT ) Judge Robert Durham FARM COUNTRY RESTAURANT, ) Uninsured Employer. ) COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS The Court conducted a compensation hearing on November 22, 2019, to determine whe

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jamadle Devon Midgette appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Midgette’s motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district co

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge. On September 9, 2012, James F. Petersen (“Petersen” or “plaintiff’) filed suit against Paige Lea Meads (“Meads” or “Sergeant Meads”), in her individual capacity, Tommy Ambrose (“Ambrose” or “Sergeant Ambrose”), in his individual capacity, Terry T. Blanchard (“Blanchard”), in his individual capacity, John Does 1-3 and Jane Doe, in their individual capacities, Rodney W. M

SUMMARY ORDER Following a jury trial in 1999, defendant-appellant Stanley Burrell was convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) and conspiring to distribute and possess heroin and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and 848. Burrell appeals the district court’s denials of his motions for a sentence reduction and for reconsideration. The district court explained its reasoning in orders ente

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: Matthew Midgett, appointed counsel for Lawrence Corey Milton, has filed a motion to withdraw on.appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no ar

KAPSNER, Justice, dissenting. [¶ 18] I respectfully dissent. [¶ 19] In paragraph 12, the majority has quoted the district court’s findings on remand. Those findings are inadequate and do not satisfy the statutory requirements for continued commitment, and I would reverse. [¶ 20] The district court relies primarily on the assessment of Dr. Sullivan, but makes no attempt to show

Sup. Ct. Ill. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Certiorari denied.

2009 ND 106 In the Matter of Christopher James Midgett. State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. Christopher James Midgett, Respondent and Appellant. No. 20080255. Supreme Court of North Dakota. Filed June 17, 2009. Dale R. Rivard (appeared), Assistant State's Attorney, and Kathryn Miller (argued), third-year law student, appearing under the rule on the