Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Defendant Derek Michaud pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine, possessing with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He filed a timely appeal challenging the district court’s sentencing decisions. We review de novo a district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines, and we review its underlying factual

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Tad Michaud pleaded guilty to five criminal counts arising from his robbery of a convenience store. Because he used a short-barreled shotgun during the crime, he was sentenced to the statutory minimum of ten years’ imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. §§ 921(a)(6), 924(c)(1). Michaud appeals from his sentence on the ground that the weapon did

*214Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

*429OPINION OF THE COURT COOK, Judge: The appellant was tried by general court-martial for a violation of Article 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 918 (premeditated murder) but was found guilty of a violation of Article 119, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 919 (voluntary manslaughter). He was sentenced as noted above. On

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

537 U.S. 867 MICHAUDv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-10855. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A

OPINION YOCK, Judge. These consolidated tax refund cases are before the Court for decision after a trial on the merits, held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and in Washington, D.C. The plaintiffs seek recovery of payments that each remitted to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) as partial payment of a 100 percent tax penalty assessed by the IRS against each of the plaintiffs pursuant to 26 U.S.C. (“I.R.C.”) § 6672 (

206 B.R. 1 (1997) Gloria MICHAUD v. UNITED STATES of America. Civil No. 96-323-SD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. March 6, 1997. *2 *3 David L. Broderick, Concord, NH, Carina J. Campobasso, Washington, DC, for U.S. Stephen C. Chute, Sarah Ruef Luck, Portland, ME, for Gl

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent because the facts in this case present a clear cut violation of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), and there is no basis in law for the unprecedented legal theory upon which the majority bases its contrary ruling. As my colleagues recognize, in Edwards, the Supreme Court established a brig

199 B.R. 248 (1996) In re Gloria MICHAUD, Debtor. Gloria MICHAUD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 94-10783-MWV. Adv. No. 95-1070-MWV. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire. April 26, 1996. *249 Stephen C. Chute, Ian M. Bennie, Chute & Associates, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff.

Neel, J. This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident in which plaintiff, Marcella Michaud (Michaud), a passenger in a rental car owned by defendant Clay Auto Rental, Inc. (Clay Auto) and driven by decedent Pierrette Soucy (Soucy), sustained serious personal injuries. Michaud commenced this declaratory judgment action against defendants, United States Fire Insurance Company (U.S. Fire), Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liber

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. Hubert Michaud appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. Michaud seeks a judgment of acquittal, or, alternatively, a new trial. Michaud was convicted on tax evasion charges for the years 1980 and 1981 under 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (1982). This is his third appeal to this court in this ca

PER CURIAM. Hubert Michaud appeals the district court’s denial of his pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in which he sought relief from a 1988 conviction on two counts of income tax evasion. Michaud’s trial counsel appealed the conviction, which was affirmed. See United States v. Michaud, 860 F.2d 495 (1st Cir.1988). Shortly after the appeal was decided, the

PER CURIAM. This is appellant’s fourth appeal arising from his conviction on two counts of tax evasion. United States v. Michaud, 860 F.2d 495 (1st Cir.1988) (direct appeal); United States v. Michaud, 901 F.2d 5 (1st Cir.1990) (motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255); United States v. Mi

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.

BREYER, Circuit Judge. Hubert Michaud appeals his conviction for “willfully attempt[ing] ... to evade ... [income] tax” liability for the years 1980 and 1981. 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (1982). His appeal is based on governmental misconduct and insufficiency of the evidence. We affirm his conviction. 1. The facts, as the jury might have found them, include the follow

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

980 F.Supp. 1381 (1996) Charles F. SAMUEL and Valerie A. Samuel, Plaintiffs, v. James MICHAUD, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial District-Idaho Judge; Quentin Harden, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial District-Idaho Magistrate; Eugene Marano, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial District-Idaho Magistrate; Gary Haman, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial