Cases

888 F.2d 1390 U.S.v.Michalopoulos NO. 88-1891 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. OCT 18, 1989 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED.

847 A.2d 294 (2004) Thomas S. MICHALOPOULOS v. C & D RESTAURANT, INC., d/b/a "Eddie and Conrad's Fine Foods." No. 2002-460-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 6, 2004. *296 Rebecca Tedford Partington, Paul S. Cantor, Providence, for Plaintiff (C & D Restaurant). Joseph C. Salvadore, for Defendant. Pre

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 4, 2015 Decided June 14, 2016 No. 15-1063 UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL.,

LoConto, J. The plaintiff, Roberta Dowd, brought an action against her insurer, United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company, Inc. in the Palmer District Court, seeking recovery on theories of breach of contract and/or liability under G.L.c. 93A and G.L.c. 176D. The defendant aggrieved of the findings and rulings of the trial judge who found for the plaintiff on the 93A count, brought this appeal. We rule that the trial judge did

275 F.3d 337 (4th Cir. 2001) SATELLITE BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents,ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA'S PUBLIC TELEVISION STATIONS; PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE; CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS; CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA; OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION, UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, INCORPORATED, Intervenors.E

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 14, 2012 Decided January 15, 2013 No. 04-1033 ECHOSTAR SATELLITE L.L.C., PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INTERVENOR

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: To facilitate speedy consideration of two mergers of major cable companies, the Federal Communications Commission ordered the merger applicants to submit certain proprietary documents for review and, central to this case, proposed to make them available for examination by other play

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Senior Judge EDWARDS. BROWN, Circuit Judge: In an industry marked by constant innovation and year-to-year change, the dispute over the regulations in this case has lasted a full decade. DISH Network L.L.C. (“DISH”),1 is a direct broadcast satellite provider. DISH challenges

GINSBURG, Chief Judge. EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., a provider of direct-to-the-home satellite television service, petitions for review of two orders in which the Federal Communications Commission adopted an improved version of its Individual Location Longley-Rice (ILLR) model for predicting the strength of broadcast television signals. In response to con*387gressional

597 F.3d 1306 (2010) CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. AT&T Inc. and Verizon, Intervenors. Nos. 07-1425, 07-1487. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 22, 2009. Decided March 12, 2010.

401 F.3d 489 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitionersv.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, RespondentsMotion Picture Association Of America, Inc., et al. Intervenors. No. 04-1037. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 22, 2005. Filed March 15, 2005.

Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. GINSBURG, Chief Judge: EchoStar petitions for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission dismissing the Company’s program access complaint against Comcast Corporation and two of its affiliates, and denying its motion to compel Comcast to produce certain documents. Comcast has intervened and filed a brief in support of the Commission. Be

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. This case involves a challenge by petitioners American Library Association, et al. to a rule adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) requiring digital television receivers and related electronic equipment ma

*691 HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. It is axiomatic that administrative agencies may issue regulations only pursuant to authority delegated to them by Congress. The principal question presented by this case is whether Congress delegated authority to the Federal Communications Commission (“Commission” or

721 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) Odell P. LAWSON, Plaintiff, v. PEPCO, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-0369 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 7, 2010. Odell P. Lawson, Washington, DC, pro se. William Patrick Flanagan, Christine Michalopoulos Burke, Hogan Lovells, McLean, VA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION E

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF RENO, No. 21-16560 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ST. STEFAN MICHALOPOULOS, Plaintiff, Case No. 26-cv-1139 (JMC) v. SENATOR ADAM SCHIFF, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 2, 2026, pro se Plaintiff St. Stefan Michalopoulos filed a civil complaint against United States Senator Adam Schiff. EC

FILED Jun 13 2023, 8:50 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

OPINION Justice ROBINSON, for the Court. The plaintiff, Dawn L. Huntley, and her attorney, Nicholas S. Gelfuso (the appellants), jointly appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the appellants contend that the hearing justice erred in: (1) vacating the entry of default against the defendant Alan Goulart; (2) denying Ms.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 11, 2023 Decided July 12, 2024 No. 22-1337 INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANT v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE SPACE EXPLORATION HOLDINGS, LLC, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 23-1001