Cases

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. Rose Meyers-Berrios was charged in an indictment on December 8, 2010 with knowingly and wilfully forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, and interfering with Transportation Security Administration officer Carlos González-Aquino, a person designated in 18 U.S.C. § 1114, and engaging in acts involving phy

MEMORANDUM ** Enrique B. Meyers appeals his 72-month sentence imposed following a jury trial conviction for bringing an illegal alien without permission in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (e

ORDER Pro se federal prisoner Reginald S. Meyers appeals a district court order that denied his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to modify his term of imprisonment. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34{j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). In 1991, Meyers pleaded guilty to charges of distribution of cocaine base

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION David Meyers appeals the revocation of his supervised release and resulting imprisonment on numerous grounds. The government contends that Meyers’ completion of his term of imprisonment resulting from the revocation order renders this appeal moot. This court concludes that Meyers’ appeal is indeed moot, thus depriving

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 9/6/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ______ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) v. ) No. 95-8079 ) DAVID MEYERS, )

906 F.Supp. 1494 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. David MEYERS, Defendant. No. 95-CR-0058-B. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. November 14, 1995. *1495 Patrick J. Crank, Assistant U.S. Attorney (WY), Casper, WY, for Plaintiff. Thomas B. Jubin, Cheyenne, WY, for Defendant. ORDER ON ME

41 F.3d 1500 U.S.v.Meyers NO. 93-1732 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Sept 02, 1994 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y. 93-cr-10M 1 AFFIRMED.

937 F.2d 619 U.S.v.Meyers* NO. 90-5758 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. JUN 26, 1991 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

828 F.2d 773 U.S.v.Meyers* NO. 86-7802 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. AUG 27, 1987 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. 2

OPINION OF THE COURT CARMICHAEL, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a military judge of two specifications of wrongfully distributing hashish and one specification of wrongfully possessing hashish with the intent to distribute, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter referred to as UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982).1 Appellant

782 F.2d 1054 U.S.v.Meyers 85-3006 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 12/23/85 1 D.Or. AFFIRMED

EVERETT, Chief Judge (dissenting): I Until the Military Rules of Evidence took effect, a prior consistent statement of a witness was admissible only for corroboration and then only under several well-defined limitations. See para. 153a, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition). Moreover, although not required by the Manual, this Court followed the rule, favored

601 F.Supp. 1072 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Stanley A. MEYERS, Defendant. Crim. No. 83-60036-PA. United States District Court, D. Oregon. October 22, 1984. *1073 Charles H. Turner, U.S. Atty., Thomas M. Coffin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eugene, Or., for plaintiff. Robert J. McCrea, McCrea, P.C., Eugene, Or., fo

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the appellants’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, It Is Ordered That: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

OPINION BUSH, Judge. Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss, which has been fully briefed and is ripe for a decision by the court. Because this court lacks jurisdiction over Counts I and II of plaintiffs’ complaint, those counts must be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). With respect to Count III of the complaint, the c

OPINION OF THE COURT FOREMAN, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of possession, transfer and sale of hashish, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976). His approved sentence provides for confinement at hard labor for two years, forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for twenty-four months, and reduction to Private E-l. Th

655 F.2d 234 * U. S.v.Meyers 80-5262 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/6/81 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

639 F.2d 785 U. S.v.Meyers 78-2607 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 10/7/80 1 N.D.Ill. VACATED AND REMANDED

636 F.2d 1205 U. S.v.Meyers 80-1159 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 10/28/80 1 W.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED