Cases

KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge (dissenting). Although the majority is “not unmindful of decisions elsewhere at variance” with its own, apparently it ascribes little significance to the fact that without exception every court which has considered this issue has held that the government is not liable for the negligence of its prison officials under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See James v. U. S., 280 F.2d 428 (8th Cir.),

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the re

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-30864 FILED January 28, 2020

PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from a judgment of convictions of first-degree murder and six sentences of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the convictions and sentences. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Ov

736 F.Supp.2d 1123 (2010) EJS PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff v. CITY OF TOLEDO, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:04CV7312. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 2, 2010. *1126 Daniel R. Harpole, Kristin R.B. White, Peter C. Houtsma, Meshach Y. Rhoades, Holland & Hart, Denver, CO, Pariss M. Coleman, II

Greaney, J. A jury in the Superior Court convicted the defendant of murder in the first degree on the theory of extreme atrocity or cruelty and of unlawful possession of a firearm.1 He *783is represented by new counsel on appeal. We conclude that errors in portions of the instructions to the jury on voluntary manslaughter created a substantial

522 F.Supp.2d 936 (2007) EJS PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TOLEDO, et. al., Defendants. No. 3:04CV7312. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 30, 2007. *937 *938 Kristin R.B. White, Meshach Y. Rhoades, Peter C. Houtsma, Holland & Hart, Denver, CO, Tim

651 F.Supp.2d 743 (2009) EJS PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TOLEDO, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:04CV7312. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 27, 2009. *747 Daniel R. Harpole, Kristin R.B. White, Peter C. Houtsma, Meshach Y. Rhoades, Holland & Hart, Denver, CO, Pariss M. Coleman, II, C

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC17-2062 ____________ MESAC DAMAS, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. December 28, 2018 PER CURIAM. This case is befo

Rubin, J. Two firearms were found in a vehicle in which defendants Femdy Elysee and Richard Davis were passengers after a Boston police officer ordered Davis to exit the vehicle when it was stopped for a traffic violation. The defendants were each charged with possession of a firearm without a license, G. L. c. 269, § 10(a), second offense, G. L. c. 269, § 10(d); possession of ammunition without a firearm identification card, G.

ACCEPTED 15-24-00128-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/16/2024 12:00 AM No. 15-24-00128-CV

ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING IN PART FEBRUARY 22, 2016 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ' CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District. Judge This matter is before the Court on the February 22, 2016 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya (Doc. #240) on a handful of motions to dismiss in the instant case. I. BACKGROUND In her

23 F.3d 400NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Philip W. CARTER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNIVERSITY OF WEST VIRGINIA SYSTEM, Board of Trustees, astate corporation (a successor state corporationto the West Vir

Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Kennedy and Justice Thomas join, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. The judgment in today’s case has an appearance of moderation and Solomonic wisdom, upholding as it does some *785portions of the injunction while disallowing others. That appearance is d

221 F.Supp. 766 (1963) George W. SHELDON, Patricia Ruth Sheldon, Merle Wallace Wingo and Betty Mae Wingo, Plaintiffs, v. Paul FANNIN, W. W. Dick, Richard A. Harvill, Lawrence J. Walkup, G. Homer Durham, Charles Burton, Bessie Kidd Best and Waldo M. Dicus, as Members of the State Board of Education of the State of Arizona, and Such Board, W. W. Dick, as Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of Arizona, Frank Crosby, Vera Matthews and A

POEEENBARGER, PRESIDENT: The State of West Virginia appealed from an order made and entered by the circuit court of Braxton county, on the 8th day of December, 1904, dissolving an injunction. The suit, in which the order was made, is one instituted by the state for the purpose of subjecting to sale a tract of 5,000 acres of land, situated in said county, as forfeited for non-entry on the land books of said county, for taxati