⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Mendoza-Ruiz”

Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-01-20 · Published · cited 0× · 522 U.S. 1083; 118 S. Ct. 868
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1996-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 517 U.S. 1106
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1996-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 517 U.S. 1106; 116 S. Ct. 1323
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 70 F.3d 1269; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34908; 1995 WL 696846
70 F.3d 1269 U.S.v.Ruiz-Mendoza* NO. 93-07718 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Oct 26, 1995 Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CR-92-209-9 1 AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010-07-29 · Published · cited 11× · 240 P.3d 1235; 225 Ariz. 473; 587 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6; 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 120
240 P.3d 1235 (2010) STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Gustavo MENDOZA-RUIZ, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CR 009-0560. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. July 29, 2010. *1236 Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney By Arthur Hazelton, Deputy County Attorney, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section, Phoenix, Attorn
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018-05-21 · Published · cited 41× · 890 F.3d 361
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This case once again calls for this Court to determine the accrual date of a claim arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671 - 2680, and the potential application of the so-called "discove
District Court, D. South Dakota · 2008-09-23 · Published · cited 1× · 587 F. Supp. 2d 1089; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72405; 2008 WL 4364612
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Juan Manuel CARRASCO-RUIZ and Pedro Salazar-Salazar, Defendants. No. Cr. 08-40029. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division. September 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. Defendant
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 900; 125 S. Ct. 82; 73 U.S.L.W. 3213; 160 L. Ed. 2d 170; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 5336
(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 868; 125 S. Ct. 211
(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 117); (95 Fed. Appx. 606); (93 Fed. Appx. 663); (95 Fed. Appx. 118); (95 Fed. Appx. 582); (95 Fed. Appx. 629); (95 Fed. Appx. 661); (95 Fed. Appx. 662); (95 Fed. Appx. 630); (95 Fed. Appx. 645); (92 Fed. Appx. 990); (95 Fed. Appx. 631); <
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1211
*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1211; 124 S. Ct. 1490
*1211(Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 70); (79 Fed. Appx. 69); (79 Fed. Appx. 18); (79 Fed. Appx. 17); (79 Fed. Appx. 75); (78 Fed. Appx. 425); (79 Fed. Appx. 40); (79 Fed. Appx. 35); *1212(79 Fed. Appx. 37);
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1130; 157 L. Ed. 2d 933; 72 U.S.L.W. 3448; 124 S. Ct. 1103; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 452
(Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 384); (72 Fed. Appx. 957); (71 Fed. Appx. 437); (72 Fed. Appx. 971); (72 Fed. Appx. 962); (74 Fed. Appx. 357); (73 Fed. Appx. 75); (71 Fed. Appx. 397); (72 Fed. Appx. 955); (72 Fed. Appx. 961); (72 Fed. Appx. 960); (72 Fed. Appx. 954);
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1130
(Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 384); (72 Fed. Appx. 957); (71 Fed. Appx. 437); (72 Fed. Appx. 971); (72 Fed. Appx. 962); (74 Fed. Appx. 357); (73 Fed. Appx. 75); (71 Fed. Appx. 397); (72 Fed. Appx. 955); (72 Fed. Appx. 961); (72 Fed. Appx. 960); (72 Fed. Appx. 954);
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-04-18 · Published · cited 15× · 135 F.4th 861
Appellate Case: 23-7057 Document: 87-1 Date Filed: 04/18/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 18, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-01-14 · Published · cited 5× · 125 F.4th 1342
Appellate Case: 23-3172 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 01/14/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH January 14, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-01-14 · Published · cited 1× · 534 U.S. 1108; 122 S. Ct. 911; 70 U.S.L.W. 3443; 151 L. Ed. 2d 878; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 472
(Reported 19 Fed. Appx. 587); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 534 U.S. 847; 15 F. App'x 404; 122 S. Ct. 112
*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-01-31 · Published · cited 3× · 91 F.4th 813
Case: 23-10167 Document: 00517051901 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10167 ____________
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023-12-19 · Published · cited 8× · 89 F.4th 173
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1929 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SHAUN WALKER, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Timothy S. Hillman, U.S. District Judge] Befor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023-04-14 · Published · cited 2× · 65 F.4th 38
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1601 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. RAYMOND LILLY, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge]