⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Mendoza-Narvaez”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-04-02 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 966
(Reported below: 234 F. 3d 411); (235 F. 3d 481); (4 Fed. Appx. 508); (4 Fed. Appx. 485); (4 Fed. Appx. 503); (2 Fed. Appx. 721); (4 Fed. Appx. 483); (238 F. 3d 432); (4 Fed. Appx. 519); (243 F. 3d 550); (4 Fed. Appx. 449); (246 F. 3d 677); (11 Fed. Appx. 713)
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-04-02 · Published · cited 145× · 532 U.S. 966; 121 S. Ct. 1503; 149 L. Ed. 2d 388; 69 U.S.L.W. 3645; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2848
(Reported below: 234 F. 3d 411); (235 F. 3d 481); (4 Fed. Appx. 508); (4 Fed. Appx. 485); (4 Fed. Appx. 503); (2 Fed. Appx. 721); (4 Fed. Appx. 483); (238 F. 3d 432); (4 Fed. Appx. 519); (243 F. 3d 550); (4 Fed. Appx. 449); (246 F. 3d 677); (11 Fed. Appx. 713)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-04-19 · Published · cited 25× · 995 F.3d 367
Case: 20-60730 Document: 00515827551 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 19, 2021 No.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 166× · 832 F.3d 569; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14810; 2016 WL 4254372
PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: Wayland Demond Hinkle appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred in determining that he was a career offender within the meaning of § 4Bl.l(a) of United States Sentencing Guidelines. 1 Hinkle argues that neither of his prior Texas convictions, one for burglary and th
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-07-30 · Published · cited 4× · 761 F.3d 397; 2014 WL 3746468; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14588
HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Luis Fernando Cedillo-Narvaez (“Luis Cedillo”) appeals the district court’s entry of final judgment of sentence and conviction. We AFFIRM. *400I. Background Juan De Dios Cedillo-Narvaez (“Juan Cedillo”) and Jose Angel Lopez (“Lopez”) planned and organized a conspiracy to kidnap a group of undocumented aliens
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-04-18 · Published · cited 42× · 641 F.3d 1031; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8139; 2011 WL 1485268
641 F.3d 1031 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco VALDOVINOS-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 2, 2010. Filed February 15, 2011. Amended April 18, 2011. *1032 David M.C. Peterson, F
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-02-15 · Published · cited 21× · 641 F.3d 1031
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-50532 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 08cr4495-MMA FRANCISCO VALDOVINOS-MENDEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. 
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-02-15 · Published · cited 4× · 641 F.3d 1031; 2011 WL 1485268
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-50532 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 08CR449-MMA FRANCISCO VALDOVINOS-MENDEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. 
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-03-10 · Published · cited 66× · 518 F.3d 1072; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5059; 2008 WL 623982
518 F.3d 1072 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose A. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-10217. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 12, 2008. Filed March 10, 2008. *1073 *1074 Jason F. Carr, Assistant Federal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-06-14 · Published · cited 40× · 608 F.3d 556; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12055; 2010 WL 2352045
608 F.3d 556 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul VILLAVICENCIO-BURRUEL, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raul Villavicencio-Burruel, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 09-50204, 09-50257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 2, 2010. Filed June 14, 2010.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-03-10 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-10217 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-05-00397-KJD JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-02-25 · Published · cited 49× · 557 F.3d 1019; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3711; 2009 WL 455512
Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge GOULD. PER CURIAM: The United States Government appeals the district court’s ruling that Gerardo Es-parza-Herrera’s prior conviction for aggravated assault under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S”) § 13-1204(A)(11) was not a conviction for a “crime of violence” under section 2L1.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (the “Guidelines”). The district court h
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 07-30490 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00219-BLW GERARDO ESPARZA-HERRERA, a.k.a. Omar Brabo Beltran, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-05-03 · Published · cited 0× · 100 F.4th 325
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1377 JOSE A. RIVERA-PINA; DENISE MALAVE-FONSECA; ELIZABETH BRUNO-ORTEGA; EUNICE A. ROSARIO-ABREU; GUILLERMO E. DE LA CRUZ-ABREU; IRIS N. FLORES-CARABALLO; JAVIER RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ; JUAN C. ROMANACCE-RODRIGUEZ; LISBETH DE LEON-MARQUEZ; LUZ J. GARCIA-ORTIZ; MARISELA FIGUEROA-VEGA; RICHARD RIVERA-CANALES; ROLANDO A. LOPEZ-SOSA; RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ; HOWARD DE LEON-ROD
State v. Sanchezpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 621 S.E.2d 630; 172 N.C. App. 330; 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 1574
Jose Sanchez ("defendant") appeals from judgment entered after a jury found him to be guilty of taking indecent liberties with a child. We hold that defendant received a fair trial free from error, vacate defendant's sentence, and remand for resentencing. I. Background E.S. ("the minor") was born on 15 April 1986. In September 1999 when she was thirteen years old, she moved from her grandparents' home in El Salvador to North Carolina to live with her mo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 23× · 990 F.3d 191
18-855-cv (L) Chevron Corp. v. Donziger UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: September 15, 2020 Decided: March 4, 2021 Docket Nos. 18-855-cv (L); 18-2191-cv; 19-1584-cv CHEVRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 34× · 919 F.3d 40
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. In this diversity case-governed by Puerto Rico law, as the parties agree (Puerto Rico is a "state" for diversity-jurisdiction purposes thanks to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (e) )-María Villeneuve contests the district judge's orders jettisoning
Chevron v. Naranjopublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
11-1150-cv(L) Chevron v. Naranjo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2011 (Argued: September 16, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2012) Docket Nos. 11-1150-cv(L) 11-1264-cv(CON) CHEVRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00340-CV 8334072 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS December 22, 2015
People v. Narvaezpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2002-12-31 · Published · cited 12× · 128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 899; 104 Cal. App. 4th 1295; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 73; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 29; 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5264
1 Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts II, III, IV, V, VI. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1297 This is a robbery case in which the court allowed the testimony of an accomplice of th