Cases

342 F.3d 948 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Raymond SHRYOCK, a/k/a Huero Shy, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Moreno, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ruben Hernandez, a/k/a Tupi, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alex Aguirre, aka, Pee Wee, aka Howard, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 853.

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Five defendants appeal their various convictions for racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, murder and drug trafficking. Four of the defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment and one received a prison term of 262 months. All of the charged conduct arises out of the defendants’ participation in the Milwauke

TROTT, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated appeals, Defendants Appellants Alex Aguirre (“Aguirre”), Juan Arias (“Arias”), Daniel Barela (“Barela”), Ruben Castro (“R. Castro”), David Gallardo (“Gallardo”), Joe Hernandez (“J.Hemandez”), Ruben Hernandez (“R. Hernandez”), Raymond Mendez (“Mendez”), Jesse Moreno (“Moreno”), Raymond Shryock (“Shryock”), and Randy Therrien (“Therrien”), (collectively “Appellants”), appeal from the

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

124 F.Supp.2d 631 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Andrew ACOSTA, Pedro Martinez, Antonio Mendez, Larry Olson, and Wilfredo Vasquez, Defendants. No. 98-CR-104. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. November 29, 2000. *632 Karine Moreno-Taxman, David Robles, U.S. Attorney's Office, Milwaukee, WI, for United S

111 F.Supp.2d 1082 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Andrew ACOSTA, Mohammed Ayesh, Doug Beyreis, Christopher Colton, Carlos Diaz, Shaun Dougherty, Jorge Espada, Vernon Fields, Felix Guzman, Jerry Guzman, Bernardo Hernandez, Raul Maldonado, Daniel Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Gamaliel Matos, Natanael Matos, Antonio Mendez, Alvaro Mendoza, Daniel Mendoza, Raciel Mendoza, Raymond Mendoza, Maico Navejar, Larry Olson,

JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Nelson Estremera appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, /.), convicting him, following a plea of guilty, of one count of conspiracy to distribute narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Estremera argues that when calculating his sentence, the district court erred by (i) failing to depart downward from

192 F.3d 81 (2nd Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.JORGE RIVERA, aka "G" or "Pekino," RALPH MORENO, aka "Ralphie," NELSON ESTREMERA, aka "Danger" and AMADOR RIVERA, aka "Beast," Defendants-Appellants,WILLIAM MENDEZ, aka "Pep," or "Pepperoni," Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Docket No. 97-1223No. 320 -- August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-50259 21-50261 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 3:20-cr-00435- LAB JUAN CARLOS CABRERA,

USCA4 Appeal: 16-4844 Doc: 188 Filed: 01/10/2024 Pg: 1 of 25 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-4844 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-ORELLANA, a/k/a Chele, a/k/a Furia,

USCA4 Appeal: 16-4845 Doc: 182 Filed: 01/10/2024 Pg: 1 of 25 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-4844 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-ORELLANA, a/k/a Chele, a/k/a Furia,

Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Before the Court is defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment [Dkt No. 22]. For the reasons stated in open court and further developed in this Memorandum Opinion, defendant's motion has been denied.1 I. Aristides Rivera Lopez, also known as Aristides Lopez Rivera ("defendant"),2 is a citizen