Cases

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: Miguel Molina appeals from an enhanced sentence imposed upon him following his plea of guilty to a one-count indictment charging illegal entry into the United States. Based upon Molina’s criminal record, the District Court departed from the sentencing range of

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

544 U.S. 1015 GONZALEZ-ANTUNAv.UNITED STATESMENCHACA-MORENO, AKA AMUNDO MENCHACAv.UNITED STATESNAVARETTE-CASTILLO, AKA CASTILLO-NAVARETTEv.UNITED STATESVARELA-MARQUEZv.UNITED STATES No. 04-9401. Supreme Court of United States. May 2, 2005. 1 C.

Case: 23-50461 Document: 105-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50461 ____________

SECTION: “G”(l) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiff Malcolm Bezet (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, alleges'that certain provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (“GCA”) and the National- Firearms Act (“NFA”) are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Tenth Amendment.1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-40167 Fifth Circuit FILED June 14, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff John Nunnelee (“Mr. Nunnelee”) initiated this property damage action against the United States of America (the “Government”) on June 14, 2011. (Doc. 1). At that particular juncture, Mr. Nunnelee was proceeding pro se. Subsequently, due to the complexity of the case, on October 5

CRONE, District Judge: Appellant Lonnie Oliver, Jr. (“Oliver”) appeals his convictions and the sentences imposed upon his pleas of guilty to aiding and abetting mail fraud and aggravated identity theft. Pursuant to a conditional plea agreement, he appeals the denial of his motion to suppress and also challenges the voluntariness of his appeal waiver and plea. Finally, Oliver challenges the factual basis supporting his aggravat

245 F.Supp.2d 1217 (2002) Gary L. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 3:01-CV-422-J-21-HTS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. June 3, 2002. *1219 Stephen B. Gallagher, Marks, Gray, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff. Reginald Luster, U.S. Attorney's Office, J

148 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2001) NATIONAL FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-0759-RV-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 31, 2001. *1274 *1275 James C. Johnston, Mobile, AL, James W.

*1508 ATKINS, Senior District Judge: Appellant, Wilson Hopson Irvin, was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 241 of conspiracy to violate the civil rights of Jerry Johnson. Irvin seeks reversal because, after two trials, his three alleged co-conspirators were acquitted. He urges a violation of the teaching of

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: Ramon G. Garza and Alfredo R. Menchaca challenge their convictions by a jury of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, and as to Garza, 18 U.S.C. § 1503, claiming that the trial court erred in making certain evidentiary rulings, in giving its jury charge and in declining to collaterally estop parts of the prosecution. They further contend that the verdic

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *534 Maranda ODonnell and other plaintiffs (collectively, "ODonnell") brought a class action suit against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges, 1 Hearing O

Case: 22-11070 Document: 00516817659 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit A True Copy United States Court of Appeals Certified Jul 12, 2023 Fifth Circuit

Opinion issued July 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00159-CV ——————————— KIMBERLY CONLEE, Appellant V. ASI LLOYDS, Appellee

545 F.3d 1340 (2008) KYOCERA WIRELESS CORPORATION, Appellant, and Qualcomm Incorporated, Appellant, and Motorola, Inc., Appellant, and Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Appellant, and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., Appellant, and Sanyo Fisher Co., Appellant, and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Appellant, and AT & T Mobility, LLC (formerly known as Cingular Wireless, LLC), Appellant, and Sprint Nextel Corporation, App

Justice Indeglia, with whom Justice Robinson joins, dissenting. Although we agree with the majority’s conclusion that, in view of the ambiguous *1245nature of the facts known to the police, the consent exception to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article 1, section 6 of the Rhode Island Constitution did not justify

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff John Breda, M.D., (“Dr. Bre-da”) has sued Robert A. McDonald, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), in his official capacity, Wilfredo Curioso, M.D. (“Dr. Curioso”), Sharon Rounds, M.D. (“Dr. Rounds”), and Satish Sharma, M.D. (“Dr. Sharma”) (collectively, “Defendants”), asserting c

No. 22 June 13, 2024 489 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. TASI AUTELE, aka Brian Mulivai Autele, aka Tasi Mulivai Autele, Petitioner on Review. (CC 17CR69755) (CA A172873) (SC S070046) En Banc On review