⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Melot”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013-10-21 · Published · cited 4× · 732 F.3d 1234; 112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6576; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21227; 2013 WL 5684028
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction After a jury trial, appellant Bill Melot was convicted of one count of corruptly endeavoring to impede the administration of the Internal Revenue Code, one count of attempting to evade or defeat tax, six counts of willful failure to file, and seven counts of making false statements to the Department of Agricultur
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-09-26 · Published · cited 2× · 768 F.3d 1082
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. The district court sanctioned Mrs. Katherine L. Melot and Mr. Billy R. Melot based on the court’s inherent authority. The Melots appeal and seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and address the merits of the appeal. This appeal requires examination of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Pr
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 491; 199 L. Ed. 2d 355
*492Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 180; 199 L. Ed. 2d 5; 86 U.S.L.W. 3158; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4509
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 1501; 194 L. Ed. 2d 593; 84 U.S.L.W. 3544; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2156
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 86; 193 L. Ed. 2d 75; 84 U.S.L.W. 3167; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 5152
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 2051; 195 L. Ed. 2d 248; 84 U.S.L.W. 3633; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3124
Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 574; 193 L. Ed. 2d 456; 84 U.S.L.W. 3301; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7367
Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 981; 187 L. Ed. 2d 770; 82 U.S.L.W. 3404; 571 U.S. 1121; 2014 WL 102368; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 551
Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 488; 190 L. Ed. 2d 369; 83 U.S.L.W. 3286; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7587
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Melot v. Robersonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-04-03 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1441; 197 L. Ed. 2d 654; 85 U.S.L.W. 3466; 2017 WL 1199497; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2274
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 213; 202 L. Ed. 2d 145
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-08-18 · Published · cited 79× · 970 F.3d 596
Case: 19-50436 Document: 00515531401 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-7019 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 07/29/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 29, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 841 F.3d 1122; 118 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6661; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20535; 2016 WL 6775914
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Eldon L. Boisseau appeals from his conviction of tax evasion, following a bench trial. 26 U.S.C. § 7201; United States v. Boisseau, 116 F.Supp.3d 1242 (D. Kan. 2015). On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and argues that the district court wrongly convicted him (1) without evidence of an affirmative act designed to c
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-10-14 · Published · cited 3× · 839 F.3d 209; 2016 WL 5956687
SACK, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Carlo J. Marinello, II, a resident of Erie County in western New York State, owned and operated a freight service that couriered items to and from the United States and Canada. From approximately 1992 through 2010, Marinel-lo neither kept corporate books or records nor filed personal or corporate income tax returns. Following an investigation by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”),
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-10-14 · Published · cited 0×
15‐2224 United States v. Marinello 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: February 11, 2016 Decided: October 14, 2016) 5
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 795 F.3d 745; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13576; 2015 WL 4621855
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Frank Pons was charged with committing wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and equity skimming, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-19, and was released from custody pending trial. Two months before trial was scheduled to begin, he fled the country. He eventually turned himself in to U.S. authorities in Brazil and later pleaded guilty to the two offenses. At sentencing the district court applied a two-level upward adjustment for
District Court, D. Kansas · 2015-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 116 F. Supp. 3d 1242; 116 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5158; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90115; 2015 WL 4092814
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge. Defendant Eldon Boisseau was indicted on one count of tax evasion for unpaid taxes and interest of more than $1 million assessed between 1998 and 2008. Bois-seau proceeded to a bench trial May 5-6, 2015. Having reviewed and considered the evidence, which was largely undisputed at .trial, the Court finds Boisseau guilty of tax evasion in yiolation of