⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Meissner”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2018-03-08 · Published · cited 0×
ORIGINAL 3Tn tbr Wnitrb $ tatrs (!Court of jfrbrral (!Claims No. 17-928T Filed: March 8, 2018 FILED ** ** * ** * * *** *** *** * * * MAR - 8 2018 GARY D. MEISSNER and * U.S. COURT OF CONNIE R. M
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-01-17 · Published · cited 17× · 201 F.3d 384; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 676; 2000 WL 29420
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Vintage Health Resources and seven Filipino nurses appeal the district court’s affirmance of the Immigration & Naturalization Service’s denial of Hl-B visas for the nurses. Because Vintage did not produce evidence sufficient to show that the nurses were members of a “specialty occupation,” as required under § 101(a)
Ortiz v. Meissnerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-06-03 · Published · cited 6× · 179 F.3d 718; 99 Daily Journal DAR 5377; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4232; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11259; 1999 WL 351119
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are all aliens who have been administratively denied legalization under one of two amnesty programs established by Congress in 1986. The first program is for “special agricultural workers” (“SAWs”), 8 U.S.C. § 1160, and the second program is for aliens who have resided in the United States since January 1, 1982, 8 U.S.C. § 1255a. The programs contain parallel provisions that allow persons
Matic v. Meissnerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 528 U.S. 1171; 120 S. Ct. 1198
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000-03-24 · Published · cited 1× · 98 F. Supp. 2d 779; 2000 WL 725705
98 F.Supp.2d 779 (2000) Hoang Thanh TUNG, Petitioner, v. Doris MEISSNER, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, and William Harrington, District Director, Dallas Ins, Respondents. No. CIV. A. 4:98-CV-1127-Y. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. March 24, 2000. *780 Hoang Thanh Tung, Pro Se
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995-11-21 · Published · cited 68× · 70 F.3d 136; 315 U.S. App. D.C. 35; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32591; 1995 WL 686067
WALD, Circuit Judge: This case involves the relationship between the Chinese Student Protection Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255 note (1994) (“CSPA”), and the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101, et seq. (1994) (“INA”). When appellant Lin Qi-Zhuo, a Chinese national who has resided in the United States since 1987, applied for adjustment of his immigration st
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995-09-11 · Published · cited 10× · 65 F.3d 1034; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25721
65 F.3d 1034 LINEA AREA NACIONAL DE CHILE S.A., d/b/a Lan-Chile Airlines,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Doris MEISSNER, Commissioner of Immigration andNaturalization Service, United States Departmentof Justice, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1540, Docket 94-6288. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued May 16, 1995.Decided Sept. 11, 1995.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-06-29 · Published · cited 2× · 315 F.R.D. 159; 2016 WL 3636012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction... 160 II. Facts... 161 III. Law... 162 A. Criminal Restitution and Civil Tax Assessment.. .162 B. Certificate of Release of Lien... 163 C. Challenging a Civil Assessment.. .164
People v. Meissnerpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011-10-25 · Published · cited 475× · 294 Mich. App. 438; 812 N.W.2d 37
O’CONNELL, J. Following a jury trial, defendant appeals by right his convictions of second-offense domestic violence, MCL 750.81(3); first-degree home invasion, MCL 750.110a(2); and obstruction of justice, MCL 750.505. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 28, 2009, Candace Worthington appeared at the Waterford police station, visibly shaken
Louis v. Meissnerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1982-02-24 · Published · cited 13× · 532 F. Supp. 881; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10860
532 F.Supp. 881 (1982) Lucien LOUIS, Jean Louis, Servebien, Pierre Silien, Serge Verdieu, Milfort Vilgard and Joel Casimir, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; and the Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., a non-profit membership corporation, on behalf of itself and its members, Plaintiffs, v. Doris MEISSNER, Acting Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Joe Howerton, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000-06-06 · Published · cited 19× · 214 F.3d 416; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12453; 2000 WL 727508
OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Circuit Judge. This case involves the interpretation of our immigration laws as they apply to Johann Breyer, a naturalized citizen who claimed, when faced with denaturalization, that he had been entitled to American citizenship by birth through his American-born mother. The statutes governing Breyer’s claim to citizenship are §
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995-09-11 · Published · cited 8× · 65 F.3d 1034; 1995 WL 546245
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS” or “the Commissioner”) appeals from a decision of the district court, Linea Area Nacional de Chile v. Sale, 865 F.Supp. 971 (E.D.N.Y.1994), granting summary judgment to plaintiff-appellee Linea Area Nacional de Chile, S.A. (“Lan-Chile”). In light of the 1986 amendments to the governing sta
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-02-22 · Published · cited 1× · 288 F.R.D. 248; 2013 WL 663925; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24744
Statements of Reasons for Sentences Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I. Introduction Defendants Shalom Rabkin and Mendy Gorodetsky are business partners. They jointly own and operate Asbestways Services Corporation (“Asbestways”), a licensed environmental abatement company with some fifty employees located in Brooklyn, New York. See R
Jean v. Meissnerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 1981-07-06 · Published · cited 0× · 90 F.R.D. 658; 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1570; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14887
ORDER HASTINGS, District Judge. I. FINDINGS OF FACT THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the' Defendants’ Return to Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus and Motion to have Parties Dropped and Claims Severed in the Complaint for Declaration, Injunction, and Mandatory Relief (hereinafter referred to as the “Return”). Petitioners1 filed an Emergency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997-06-13 · Published · cited 6× · 114 F.3d 1240; 325 U.S. App. D.C. 32; 1997 WL 314523; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13902
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE Before: WALD, WILLIAMS, and TATEL, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM. The Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) has moved for summary affirmance of the district court’s denial of Obinna Maduka’s petiti
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 759 So. 2d 225; 2000 WL 349042
759 So.2d 225 (2000) William Baynard MEISSNER v. Marie de Villier Roy MEISSNER. No. 99-681. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 5, 2000. Writ Denied June 16, 2000. *226 Robin A. Anderson, Lake Charles, LA, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee. Karl E. Boellert, Lake Charles, LA, Counsel for Defend
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 707 So. 2d 1040; 1998 La. App. LEXIS 208; 1998 WL 63817
YELVERTON, Judge. This is an appeal from the dismissal of a divorce action on a plea of res judicata based on a Brazilian judgment. The trial court recognized the foreign judgment as having a preclusive effect on the wife’s Louisiana demands for divorce, alimony, and a division of property. We affirm in part and reverse in part. William and Marie Meissner were married on November 29, 1983, in
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-06-13 · Published · cited 7× · 412 F.3d 1021
412 F.3d 1021 Oumar SISSOKO; Julie Sissoko, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Loyda R. ROCHA; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants.Oumar Sissoko, an individual; Julie Sissoko, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Alberto R. Gonzales,* Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service; Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United Stat
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-03-16 · Published · cited 18× · 440 F.3d 1145
440 F.3d 1145 Oumar SISSOKO; Julie SISSOKO, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Loyda R. ROCHA; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants.Oumar Sissoko, an individual; Julie Sissoko, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Alberto R. Gonzales,* Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service; Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United Stat
Breyer v. Meissnerpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998-08-27 · Published · cited 4× · 23 F. Supp. 2d 521; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13237; 1998 WL 544957
23 F.Supp.2d 521 (1998) Johann BREYER v. Doris MEISSNER, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Civil Action No. 97-6515. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 27, 1998. *522 *523 Willan Franklyn Joseph, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. David F. Legge, U.S. Dept.