Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Meissner”
Meissner v. United Statespublic domain
ORIGINAL 3Tn tbr Wnitrb $ tatrs (!Court of jfrbrral (!Claims No. 17-928T Filed: March 8, 2018 FILED ** ** * ** * * *** *** *** * * * MAR - 8 2018 GARY D. MEISSNER and * U.S. COURT OF CONNIE R. M
Defensor v. Meissnerpublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Vintage Health Resources and seven Filipino nurses appeal the district court’s affirmance of the Immigration & Naturalization Service’s denial of Hl-B visas for the nurses. Because Vintage did not produce evidence sufficient to show that the nurses were members of a “specialty occupation,” as required under § 101(a)
Ortiz v. Meissnerpublic domain
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are all aliens who have been administratively denied legalization under one of two amnesty programs established by Congress in 1986. The first program is for “special agricultural workers” (“SAWs”), 8 U.S.C. § 1160, and the second program is for aliens who have resided in the United States since January 1, 1982, 8 U.S.C. § 1255a. The programs contain parallel provisions that allow persons
Matic v. Meissnerpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Hoang Thanh Tung v. Meissnerpublic domain
98 F.Supp.2d 779 (2000) Hoang Thanh TUNG, Petitioner, v. Doris MEISSNER, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, and William Harrington, District Director, Dallas Ins, Respondents. No. CIV. A. 4:98-CV-1127-Y. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. March 24, 2000. *780 Hoang Thanh Tung, Pro Se
Lin Qi-Zhuo v. Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United States Immigration and Naturalization Servicepublic domain
WALD, Circuit Judge: This case involves the relationship between the Chinese Student Protection Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255 note (1994) (“CSPA”), and the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101, et seq. (1994) (“INA”). When appellant Lin Qi-Zhuo, a Chinese national who has resided in the United States since 1987, applied for adjustment of his immigration st
Linea Area Nacional De Chile v. Meissnerpublic domain
65 F.3d 1034 LINEA AREA NACIONAL DE CHILE S.A., d/b/a Lan-Chile Airlines,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Doris MEISSNER, Commissioner of Immigration andNaturalization Service, United States Departmentof Justice, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1540, Docket 94-6288. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued May 16, 1995.Decided Sept. 11, 1995.
United States v. Rabkinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction... 160 II. Facts... 161 III. Law... 162 A. Criminal Restitution and Civil Tax Assessment.. .162 B. Certificate of Release of Lien... 163 C. Challenging a Civil Assessment.. .164
People v. Meissnerpublic domain
O’CONNELL, J. Following a jury trial, defendant appeals by right his convictions of second-offense domestic violence, MCL 750.81(3); first-degree home invasion, MCL 750.110a(2); and obstruction of justice, MCL 750.505. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 28, 2009, Candace Worthington appeared at the Waterford police station, visibly shaken
Louis v. Meissnerpublic domain
532 F.Supp. 881 (1982) Lucien LOUIS, Jean Louis, Servebien, Pierre Silien, Serge Verdieu, Milfort Vilgard and Joel Casimir, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; and the Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., a non-profit membership corporation, on behalf of itself and its members, Plaintiffs, v. Doris MEISSNER, Acting Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Joe Howerton, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization
OPINION OF THE COURT ROTH, Circuit Judge. This case involves the interpretation of our immigration laws as they apply to Johann Breyer, a naturalized citizen who claimed, when faced with denaturalization, that he had been entitled to American citizenship by birth through his American-born mother. The statutes governing Breyer’s claim to citizenship are §
Linea Area Nacional De Chile S.A. v. Meissnerpublic domain
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS” or “the Commissioner”) appeals from a decision of the district court, Linea Area Nacional de Chile v. Sale, 865 F.Supp. 971 (E.D.N.Y.1994), granting summary judgment to plaintiff-appellee Linea Area Nacional de Chile, S.A. (“Lan-Chile”). In light of the 1986 amendments to the governing sta
United States v. Gorodetskypublic domain
Statements of Reasons for Sentences Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I. Introduction Defendants Shalom Rabkin and Mendy Gorodetsky are business partners. They jointly own and operate Asbestways Services Corporation (“Asbestways”), a licensed environmental abatement company with some fifty employees located in Brooklyn, New York. See R
Jean v. Meissnerpublic domain
ORDER HASTINGS, District Judge. I. FINDINGS OF FACT THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the' Defendants’ Return to Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus and Motion to have Parties Dropped and Claims Severed in the Complaint for Declaration, Injunction, and Mandatory Relief (hereinafter referred to as the “Return”). Petitioners1 filed an Emergency
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE Before: WALD, WILLIAMS, and TATEL, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM. The Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) has moved for summary affirmance of the district court’s denial of Obinna Maduka’s petiti
Meissner v. Meissnerpublic domain
759 So.2d 225 (2000) William Baynard MEISSNER v. Marie de Villier Roy MEISSNER. No. 99-681. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 5, 2000. Writ Denied June 16, 2000. *226 Robin A. Anderson, Lake Charles, LA, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee. Karl E. Boellert, Lake Charles, LA, Counsel for Defend
Meissner v. Meissnerpublic domain
YELVERTON, Judge. This is an appeal from the dismissal of a divorce action on a plea of res judicata based on a Brazilian judgment. The trial court recognized the foreign judgment as having a preclusive effect on the wife’s Louisiana demands for divorce, alimony, and a division of property. We affirm in part and reverse in part. William and Marie Meissner were married on November 29, 1983, in
412 F.3d 1021 Oumar SISSOKO; Julie Sissoko, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Loyda R. ROCHA; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants.Oumar Sissoko, an individual; Julie Sissoko, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Alberto R. Gonzales,* Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service; Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United Stat
440 F.3d 1145 Oumar SISSOKO; Julie SISSOKO, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Loyda R. ROCHA; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants.Oumar Sissoko, an individual; Julie Sissoko, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Alberto R. Gonzales,* Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service; Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United Stat
Breyer v. Meissnerpublic domain
23 F.Supp.2d 521 (1998) Johann BREYER v. Doris MEISSNER, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Civil Action No. 97-6515. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 27, 1998. *522 *523 Willan Franklyn Joseph, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. David F. Legge, U.S. Dept.