⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. McDuffie”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-30 · Published · cited 0× · 236 F. App'x 277
*278MEMORANDUM * Deondra McDuffie and Elijah Fuhr appeal the sentencing determination of the District Court arising from convictions for their involvement in a drug ring conspiracy in Seattle, Washington. We have jurisdiction over these matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and jurisdiction over a sentence within the United Sta
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007-05-04 · Published · cited 1× · 65 M.J. 631; 2007 CCA LEXIS 225; 2007 WL 1725770
OPINION OF THE COURT SCHOLZ, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of one specification of reckless driving in violation of Article 111, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 911, and one specification of involuntary manslaughter in violation of Article 119, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 919. A panel of officer and enlisted members sentenced the appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 1 year, and reduction
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 17 F. App'x 181
PER CURIAM. Darryl Q. McDuffie pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C .A. § 922(g) (West 2000), and passing counterfeit currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (1994). McDuffie received an enhanced sentence as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (1994). He appeals, claiming his sentence should be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s recen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-06-11 · Published · cited 0× · 13 F. App'x 295
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the, district court be and it hereby is affirmed.
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 43 M.J. 646; 1995 CCA LEXIS 266; 1995 WL 611313
OPINION OF THE COURT MORGAN, Judge: Appellant pled to and was found guilty of three specifications of writing checks with intent to defraud, three specifications of uttering worthless checks, larceny of food and beverages from the Noncommissioned Officers’ (NCO) Club, and use of cocaine on divers occasions in violation of Articles 123a, 134, 121, and 112a, respectively, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 341; 199 L. Ed. 2d 227; 86 U.S.L.W. 3177; 2017 WL 3839567; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 6159
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 1275; 200 L. Ed. 2d 426
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 138 S. Ct. 284; 199 L. Ed. 2d 182; 86 U.S.L.W. 3157; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4703
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
U.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 28 M.J. 869; 1989 CMR LEXIS 479; 1989 WL 61712
OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, Judge: Appellant asserts that he cannot, as the owner of a car, be convicted of a conspiracy to destroy the same car. We believe that under the circumstances of this case, appellant did conspire to destroy the “property of another” and affirm. In an attempt to defraud his insurance company, appellant conspired with Private First Class (PFC) Harrison to destr
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 2393; 192 L. Ed. 2d 176; 83 U.S.L.W. 3879; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 3619
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 2148; 188 L. Ed. 2d 1135; 82 U.S.L.W. 3650; 572 U.S. 1106; 2014 WL 1313102; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3150
Case below, 550 Fed.Appx. 859.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 973 A.2d 734; 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 302; 2009 WL 2039180
973 A.2d 734 (2009) McDUFFIE v. U.S. No. 06-CM-1122. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. June 1, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 911
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 911; 122 S. Ct. 2371
536 U.S. 911 McDUFFIE ET AL.v.UNITED STATES. No. 01-9919. Supreme Court of the United States. June 10, 2002. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 24 Fed. Appx. 167.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-12-30 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 18-60700 Document: 00515252426 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/30/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 18-60700 United States Court of Appeals No. 18-60701 Fifth Circuit FILED
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 911
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 534 U.S. 1166; 122 S. Ct. 1181
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
McDuffie v. Crewspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 667; 187 L. Ed. 2d 440; 82 U.S.L.W. 3299; 571 U.S. 1035; 2013 WL 5743860; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8269
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 453; 196 L. Ed. 2d 329; 85 U.S.L.W. 3227; 2016 WL 5470486; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6794
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 530 U.S. 1263
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.