Cases

Appellate Case: 20-7052 Document: 010110722121 Date Filed: 08/09/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 9, 2022

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nathaniel B. M C DONALD Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Joshua J. McDONALD Aviation Electronics Technician First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Cedric L. McDONALD, Private First Class United States Army, Appellant No. 18-0308 Crim. App. No. 20160339 Argued February 19, 2019—Decide

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700172 _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Chester N. MCDONALD Information Systems Technician Chief Petty

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Nicholas McDonald was a heroin dealer in the Bangor area of Maine, obtaining his heroin on trips to Worcester, Massachu*499setts. Eventually, when caught with 26.4 grams of heroin, he was charged both for the heroin and a gun in his possession. McDonald pleaded guilty in February 2014 to one count of possession with intent to distribute heroin in

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, T.H. CAMPBELL, T.P. BELSKY Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES F. MCDONALD CHIEF AVIATION ELECTRICIAN’S MATE (E-7

12‐2056‐cr United States v. McDonald UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2013 (Argued: Dec. 11, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2014) Docket No. 12‐2056‐cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ROBERT E. MCDONALD, Defend

SACK, Circuit Judge: This appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John G. Koeltl, Judge), convicting the defendant on three federal fraud charges. The principal issue before us is the propriety of the actions taken by a trial judge, presiding over a criminal trial, after a jury poll revealed that the guilty verdict rendered was not unanimous. In this case, upon lea

ORDER ON (1) GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED ANSWER AND MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY; AND (2) STEPHEN SMITH’S SECOND AMENDED ANSWER AND MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. On March 4, 2014, Nicholas McDonald entered a conditional plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and consented to the forfeiture of the firearm to the Government. Minute Entry

PER CURIAM: * Johnny Arthur McDonald was convicted of one count of possessing 67.15 kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute and was sentenced to serve 63 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. In this appeal, he raises several challenges to the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We review a district court’s factual findings on a motion to suppress for

ORDER Gary McDonald pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 to 188 months’ imprisonment, the low end of the guidelines range. McDonald filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer seeks to withdraw on the ground that all possible claims are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386

825 F.Supp.2d 472 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert E. McDONALD, Defendant. No. 11 Cr. 19 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 22, 2011. *474 Arlo Devlin-Brown, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Bruce Kevin Kaye, Barasch McGarry Salzman Penson & Lim, New York, NY, for

*76Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin McDonald seeks to appeal the district court’s order conditionally filing his motion for return of property. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006

PER CURIAM: * Johnny Arthur McDonald appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and specifically the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Because McDonald received ineffective assistance in conjunction with his guilty plea which affected the voluntar

592 F.3d 808 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwayne E. McDONALD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2703. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 6, 2009. Decided January 25, 2010. *809 Michelle L. Jacobs, Attorney, Paul Kanter, Attorney (argued), Office of the United Stat

*827Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Timothy Gerrell McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons sta

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ian McDonald seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of

*827Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Timothy Gerrell McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons sta