Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700088 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MICHAEL B. MCCOLLUM Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William McCollum, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence based on Amendments 591, 706, and 711 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and conclude the

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leon McCollum seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A ce

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leon McCollum appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leon McCollum appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Kelvin McCollum appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cour

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Kelvin McCollum appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cour

443 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ricky T. McCOLLUM, Defendant, and Wanda T. McCollum, Interested Person No. 8:05CR256. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. August 9, 2006. *1155 *1156 Thomas J. Kangior, Assistant United States Attorney, Omaha, NE, for

OPINION OF THE COURT BRESLIN, Senior Judge: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial tried the appellant. The court-martial convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of raping a child under the age of 16 years on divers occasions, committing indecent acts upon the body of a child on divers occasions, and having carnal knowledge of a child over the age of 12 years on divers occasions, in v

Judge BAKER delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge alone. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of rape, indecent acts with a child under the age of 16, and carnal knowledge, on divers occasions in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ

43 F.3d 679 U.S.v.McCollum* NO. 93-8982 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 23, 1994 Appeal From: N.D.Ga., No. 92-00142-1-CR-5 1 AFFIRMED.

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Taison McCollum pleaded guilty in federal court to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). At his sentencing, the district court applied a sentencing enhancement under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) of the Sentencing Guidelines ba

970 F.2d 901 U.S.v.McCollum (Edward E., Jr.) NO. 92-1009 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. June 30, 1992 Appeal From: E.D.Pa., Fullam, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

993 F.2d 879 U.S.v.McCollum (Spencer), a/k/a 'Money' Spencer McCollum NO. 92-5136 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Apr 06, 1993 Appeal From: D.N.J., Lifland, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

EVERETT, Chief Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): Recently, in United States v. Mayo, 12 M.J. 286 (C.M.A.1982), we reaffirmed that a specification is not legally sufficient if it omits an element of the offense. Consistent with that opinion I cannot now uphold the present specification insofar as it seeks to allege extortion, in violation of Article 12

COOK, Judge (dissenting): I would affirm the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review. See my dissent in United States v. Alef, 3 M.J. 414, 421 (C.M.A.1977).

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES D. WALKER, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Debtor-Plaintiffs complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt. This is a core matter within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). After considering the pleadings, the evidence, and the applicable authorities, the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in conformance with F