Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, AMENDED OPINION *

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10435 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01263- v. ROS-1 AHMED ALAHMEDALABDALOKLAH, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Arturo Esparza appeals his conviction for importing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. On February 19, 2011, Esparza attempted to enter the United States, driving a car that had multiple packages of marijuana hidden in the gas tank and dashboard. At trial, the only contested issue was the critical fact o

644 F.3d 1111 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shaune Corey PAYNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-5111. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 10, 2011. Shaune Corey Payne, pro se. Leena Alam, Assistant United States Attorney, (Thomas Scott Woodward, United States Attorney, Northern District of Oklahoma, with her on the brief),

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT FEDERAL CAPITAL CONVICTIONS AND DEATH SENTENCES MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................682 A. Factual Background ............................

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Martin Alcan-tara-Castillo (Alcantara) challenges his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alcantara contends that a new trial is warranted because the government improperly compelled Alcantara to challenge the veracity of a government witness during the government’s cross-examination and

585 F.3d 1237 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Zarate LIERA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-50546. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued December 10, 2008. Submitted May 5, 2009. Filed November 4, 2009. *1239 Steven F. Hubacheck, Federal Defenders of San

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-50546 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-07-00488- CARLOS ZARATE LIERA, LAB-1 Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California

812 F.Supp.2d 39 (2011) The UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Kassie WESTMORELAND, Plaintiff, v. AMGEN, INC.; International Nephrology Network renamed Integrated Nephrology Network, a d/b/a of Dialysis Purchasing Alliance, Inc.; and ASD Healthcare, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-10972-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 15, 2011.

Opinion by Judge CEBULL; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI QPINION CEBULL, District Judge. Juan Ramirez-Lopez (Ramirez-Lopez) seeks reversal of his jury conviction for criminal violations 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(i), (a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(1)(B)(iv), and (a)(2)(B)(ii) (alien smuggling, alien smuggling for profit, and transportation of aliens resulting in death). He was sentenced to a term of s

621 F.3d 941 (2010) Rogelio CAMACHO-CRUZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-74483. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted August 12, 2010.[*] Filed September 2, 2010. Xavier Gonzales, Las Vegas, NV, for the petitioner. Charles E. Canter, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of I

MEMORANDUM*** Jose Antonio Nunez Matus, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for a review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his petition to reopen his removal proceedings. Matus argues that (1) notwithstanding his ineligibility for cancellation of removal, under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii), we should reverse the BIA’s decision and remand the case for considerat

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge *1316This matter is before the Court on two motions filed by Defendant Nissan North America ("NNA"): (1) a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 15] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) ; and (2) a Motion to Strike or Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Allegations [Doc. No. 21] based on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision

BURKE, Judge. The appellant, David H. Wiggins, was convicted of murdering Kyle Cavins during the course of a robbery, an offense defined as capital by § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975, and for robbing Jonathan Beasley, a violation of § 13A-8-41, Ala.Code 1975. The jury recommended, by a vote of 10 to 2, that Wiggins be sentenced to death for the capital-murder conviction. The circuit court followed the jury’s recommendation <

441 P.2d 229 (1968) 79 N.M. 189 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonnie K. MANLOVE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. April 19, 1968. Rehearing Denied May 8, 1968. Certiorari Denied May 24, 1968. *230 C. N. Morris, M. Rosenberg, Rosenb