Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Mathiesen”
Mathiesen v. Washingtonpublic domain
Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.
Cruise Holdings, Ltd. v. Mathiesenpublic domain
On Motion for Stay Pending Bankruptcy Proceedings COPE, J. Cruise Holdings, Ltd. moves for a stay of this appeal on account of pending bankruptcy proceedings. We grant the stay. *335Cruise Holdings suffered an adverse judgment in the trial court and appealed to this court. Premier Operations, Ltd. is
Mathiesen v. M/V Obelixpublic domain
POLITZ, Circuit Judge: Unimills B.V. and Margarine Verkaufs Union GmbH1 seek recovery of storage charges incurred because of a delay experienced in the loading and transportation of soybeans. That delay resulted from the collision of a vessel chartered to transport the soybeans with another vessel, prior to the time the soybeans were loaded. Applying the rule of Robins Drydock & Repair Co.
State v. Mathiesenpublic domain
Andersen, J. Facts of Case The defendant, Gene Leslie Mathiesen, was convicted at a jury trial of three counts of possession of a controlled substance, each offense occurring on a different date. He appeals from his conviction on count 2, possession of a controlled substance with intent to manufacture or deliver, committed on February 5, 1979. The sparse record before us indicates that the
Mathiesen v. Panama Canal Co.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CROWE, District Judge. This action in personam was filed by the plaintiff, Arthur H. Mathiesen, as owner of the M/S BETTINA against the defendant, The Panama Canal Company on May 5, 1972 almost three years after the date of the accident on May 16, 1968. The collision between the M/S BETTINA and the M/S GABONKUST occurred at about 0680 hours and thereafter on the same
Pacheco v. United Medical Associates, P.C.public domain
Mercure, J.P. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered January 25, 2002 in Broome County, which, inter aha, partially granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff provided medical services for defendant United Medical Associates, P.C. (hereinafter UMA) from 1992 until 1995. Plaintiff then opened his own medical practice in the Village of Johnson City, Broome County,
817 F.2d 345 1987 A.M.C. 2183 Arth H. MATHIESEN and Rederi A/S Mascot, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.M/V OBELIX, her engines, boilers, tackle, etc. and StatistixShipping N.V., Defendants-Appellees,v.UNIMILLS B.V. and Margarine Verkaufs Union, GmbH, Appellants.UNIMILLS B.V. and Margarine Verkaufs Union GmbH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATISTIX SHIPPING, N.V., et al., Defendants-Appellees. <
United States v. Loew's Inc.public domain
PALMIERI, District Judge. This is a petition by National General Corporation (National) pursuant to Article III, ¶ 7(b) of the Consent Judgment as to Twentieth-Century-Fox Film Corporation for permission to acquire eight conventional theatres, presently operated under the trade name of Town & Country Theatres. Six of these theatres are in Nassau County, Long Island, one in Warwick, Rhode Island, and one in Brooklyn, New
Controls Solutions, Inc., United Phosphorus, Inc. and Mark Boyd v. Gharda USA, Inc. and Gharda Chemical Ltd.public domain
Opinion issued August 16, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-10-00719-CV ——————————— CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC., AND MARK BOYD, Appellants
Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Honorable Bernard M. Decker, United States District Judgepublic domain
PER CURIAM. In more than forty separate antitrust actions brought in eight judicial districts, plaintiffs, state and local governments, public schools, and public libraries, sought damages from twenty-three defendants (petitioners here), publishers and wholesalers, for alleged conspiracies to inflate the prices for children’s editions of library books. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 14
Telian v. Town of Delhipublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Ernie Telian appeals from a May 13, 2015 Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissing, on a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), his malicious prosecution claim, and from a January 14, 2017 Order dismissing his equal protection and conspiracy claims, pursuant to a motion under Fed. R, Civ. P. 56. Telian argues on appea
State v. McKinneypublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/10/2026 08:08 AM CDT - 172 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports STATE v. McKINNEY Cite as 321 Neb. 172 State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Christop
Wunderlich v. County of Santa Cruzpublic domain
178 Cal.App.4th 680 (2009) KENNETH WUNDERLICH et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. H032375. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. October 23, 2009. *685 Dana McRae, County Counsel, and Dwight L. Herr, Special Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants. Edm
State v. Nelsonpublic domain
Justice HIMONAS, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 Martin Chris Nelson shot and killed Chad Grijalva and Derek Davis. He shot each man eight times-hitting them with all *1035 sixteen bullets in his gun-including an "immediately incapacitating" sh
*810ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PARTIAL LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge Before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CAL FIRE”) and several of its employees, Jim Crawford, Shana Jones, Derek Witmer, Ken Pimlott
DeBari v. TOWN OF MIDDLETON, NYpublic domain
9 F.Supp.2d 156 (1998) June DeBARI, Arthur DeBari, Gerard DeBari and Lawrence DeBari, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF MIDDLETON, NEW YORK; Village of Margaretville, New York; John Mathiesen; Walton Heley, Jr. and Carl Wallman, Defendants. No. 97-CV-1422. United States District Court, N.D. New York. May 22, 1998. *157
Bolinger v. Nealpublic domain
259 P.3d 1259 (2010) Preston BOLINGER; Blythe Bolinger; Dave Mathiesen; Brenda Shelton; Edwin Coulter; Donna Coulter; Glenn Wollam; Bonnie Schoenstein; and Mill Creek Subdivision Homeowners Association, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Dennis NEAL and Plains View Development, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, and Walt DeWolf; Carol DeWolf; a
Opinion ASHMANN-GERST, J. — -The County of Los Angeles (County) appeals from the judgment in favor of Jewish Community Centers Development Corporation (JCC) on its property tax refund action based on the welfare exemption set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 214. 1 The County contends that
State v. Nelsonpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 62 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. MARTIN CHRIS NELSON, Appellant. No. 20100157
Whitman v. Troypublic domain
Whitman v City of Troy (2004 NY Slip Op 24086) Whitman v City of Troy 2004 NY Slip Op 24086 [3 Misc 3d 794] March 25, 2004 Supreme Court, Rensselaer County Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.