Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Mata-Galindo”
Lopez-Ruiz v. United Statespublic domain
*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848
United States v. Peralta-Espinozapublic domain
413 F.Supp.2d 972 (2006) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Cirilo PERALTA-ESPINOZA Defendant. No. 04-CR-282. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. February 3, 2006. *973 Penelope L. Coblentz, United States Department of Justice, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Calvin R. Malone, Feder
United States v. Palacios-Suarezpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0311p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED
United States v. Wilsonpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 02-4202 FERNANDO FREDERICK WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B.
United States v. German Palacios-Suarezpublic domain
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge, concurring. No fewer than eight of our sister circuits have addressed the precise question presented in the case at bar. All eight have concluded that the term “a conviction for an aggravated felony,” as used in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, includes a felony conviction in a state court for a drug offense that would be punishable only as a misdemeanor under the relevant federal statute. S
United States v. Jose Abelardo Amaya-Portillopublic domain
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Senior Judge CACHERIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER joined. Judge SHEDD wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION CACHERIS, Senior District Judge. Jose Amaya-Portillo appeals the district court’s application of Sentencing Guideline 2L1.2(b)(l)(C), a sentencing enhancement applied when an alien was pre
United States v. Fernando Frederick Wilsonpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON joined. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge. Fernando Frederick Wilson appeals his conviction under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2) for unlawful reentry of a deported alien. On appeal, he asserts that the district court erred by fa
United States v. Ernesto Ibarra-Galindopublic domain
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge CANBY. O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether a state felony drug crime, which would not be a felony under federal law, nevertheless may constitute an “aggravated felony” for purposes of enhancing a sentence for illegally reentering the United States. I Ernesto Ibarra-Galindo, a native and citizen of Me
United States v. Gonzalezpublic domain
ORDER WARREN, District Judge. The defendant in this case has filed a motion for a new trial, pursuant to Rule 33, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Accompanying that motion is defendant’s motion for release on bail. The motion for release on bail is based entirely upon the motion for a new trial and the attachments thereto. For the reasons set forth below, both motions will be denied.
State v. Thonpublic domain
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. THON NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.
Carlos A. Mejia Galindo v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIIpublic domain
Sykes, Circuit Judge. Carlos Alberto Mejia Galindo, a native of Honduras and a lawful permanent resident, faces removal from the United States as a result of three Kentucky convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia. 1 The immigration judge determined that Mejia Galindo is not removable under
Carlos A. Mejia Galindo v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIIpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1253 CARLOS ALBERTO MEJIA GALINDO, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Re
State v. Buttercasepublic domain
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. BUTTERCASE NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE V.
Chi Jing Liao v. Rabbettpublic domain
OPINION RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge. Respondents appeal from the district court’s order granting habeas relief to petitioner, Chi Jing Liao, and declaring him eligible to apply for cancellation of removal. While conceding he was removable on other grounds, Liao’s habeas petition challenged the determination of the Board of
Lopez v. Gonzalespublic domain
*50Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court. The question raised is whether conduct made a felony under state law but a misdemeanor under the Controlled Substances Act is a “felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act.” 18 U. S. C. § 924(c)(2). We hold it is not. I A The Immigratio
State v. Abejidepublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/03/2016 10:06 AM CDT - 687 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 293 Nebraska R eports STATE v. ABEJIDE Cite as 293 Neb. 687 State of Nebraska, ap
Bing Quan Lin v. U.S. Attorney Generalpublic domain
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Bing Quan Lin seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. On appeal, Lin raises a variety of claims—some properly before this Court; some not. As for Lin’s constitutional claims, those challenging the order of removal itself, and those addressing the
Gonzales-Gomez v. Achimpublic domain
372 F.Supp.2d 1062 (2005) Rafael GONZALES-GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. Deborah ACHIM, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Chicago Field Office Director, Respondent. No. 05 C 0189. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 11, 2005. *1063 Rafael Gonzalez-Gomez, Elgin, IL, pro se. AUSA, Sheila McNulty,
Berhe v. Gonzalespublic domain
HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Herman Henry and Ambessa Hagos Berhe 1 each petition for review of Board of Immigration Appeals’ decisions ordering their removal. We have written a single opinion dealing with those separate petitions because they both question whether a state misdemeanor drug offense can constitute an “aggravated
State v. Galindopublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/01/2023 09:07 AM CDT -1- Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 315 Nebraska Reports STATE V. GALINDO Cite as 315 Neb. 1 State of Nebraska, appelle