Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

16 F.3d 341 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1545 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Noel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis Alberto GARIBALDI-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Geraldo PRIETO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Fernando ALCAREZ-O

166 F.3d 1052 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1276 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Octavio DOMINGUEZ-CARMONA, Defendant-Appellee.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jorge Hernandez-Villanueva, Defendant-Appellee.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jose Rubio-Loya, Defendant-Appellee.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Francisco Romo-Medina, D

DUFFY, District Judge: For years Lavont Flanders, Jr., and Emerson Callum (collectively, “Defendants” or “Appellants”) perpetrated a scheme in which they fraudulently lured women to South Florida, drugged them with Benzodiazepines, filmed them engaging in sexual acts, and distributed the pornographic footage. Ater a six-day trial, a jury convicted both Flanders and Callum on m

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-1339 _____________ ROSA ELIDA CASTRO; A.A.G.C.; LAURA LISSETH FLORES-PICHINTE; E.S.U.F.; KAREN MARGARITA ZELAYA ALBERTO; S.E.A.Z; KELLY GUTIERREZ RUBIO; G.J.S.G.; GLADIS CARRASCO GOMEZ; B.J.R.C.; WENDY AMPARO OSORIO MARTINEZ; D.S.R.O.; CARMEN LEIVA-MENJIVAR; E.A.M.L.; A.M.M.L.; DINA ISAB

*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 591); (95 Fed. Appx. 572); (95 Fed. Appx. 677); (95 Fed. Appx. 686); (95 Fed. Appx. 694); (95 Fed. Appx. 576); (95 Fed. Appx. 691); (95 Fed. Appx. 668); (95 Fed. Appx. 693); (95 Fed. Appx. 567); (95 Fed. Appx. 672); (95 Fed. Appx. 616);

(Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 384); (72 Fed. Appx. 957); (71 Fed. Appx. 437); (72 Fed. Appx. 971); (72 Fed. Appx. 962); (74 Fed. Appx. 357); (73 Fed. Appx. 75); (71 Fed. Appx. 397); (72 Fed. Appx. 955); (72 Fed. Appx. 961); (72 Fed. Appx. 960); (72 Fed. Appx. 954);

(Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 384); (72 Fed. Appx. 957); (71 Fed. Appx. 437); (72 Fed. Appx. 971); (72 Fed. Appx. 962); (74 Fed. Appx. 357); (73 Fed. Appx. 75); (71 Fed. Appx. 397); (72 Fed. Appx. 955); (72 Fed. Appx. 961); (72 Fed. Appx. 960); (72 Fed. Appx. 954);

Case: 24-50160 Document: 147-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 29, 202

Case: 24-30364 Document: 80-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-30364 August 26, 2025

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH JAN 4 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 9, 2024 Decided February 6, 2024 No. 23-3228 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. DONALD J. TRUMP, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-cr-00257-

PER CURIAM: The appellant, Frank Suarez, challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States on his claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “FTCA”). Because Suarez failed to meet a jurisdictional *1065prerequisite to such a suit, the district court correctly declined to hear Suarez’s claim. I. BACKGROUND

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Fernando Alearez-Ochoa (Alcarez-Ochoa) and Benito Rubio-Garcia (Rubio-Garcia) appeal from their judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute it, and conspiracy to distribute 500 kilograms of cocaine. They contend that the court erred prejudicially in admitting the testimony of Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent Tim Sellers concerning incriminating statements

Case: 21-50140 Document: 00516318159 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 13, 2022

John M. Gerrard, Chief United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendant, John Christopher Good's, objection (filing 512) to the Findings and Recommendation and Order (filing 503) of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filing 335) be denied. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress, pursuant to

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1193THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Santos Gonzales' Motion for Production of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements, Pre-Trial Hearing on Their Admissibility Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), filed May 9, 2017 (Doc. 1141)("Gonzales Motion"); (ii) Defenda

PER CURIAM: Appellants were convicted of a series of racketeering, drug, and firearm offenses-including several offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924 -in connection with their activities as members of a New Orleans gang. While this appeal was pending, the Supreme

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Charles Jason Wood’s Motion to Suppress. (Doc. #26.) The Court held a half-day evidentiary hearing on the Motion on Februaxy 23, 2017. For the reasons described herein, Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is granted. I. BACKGROUND