Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Martinez-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Martinez-Reyes has *504hot filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s br

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Martinez-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Martinez-Reyes has *504hot filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s br

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 692.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Ricardo Reyes-Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance i

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION, AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, filed May 28, 2015 (Doc. 9)(“PFRD”); (ii) the Objections to Review Portal to Portal Act, State v. Reyes,

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Fed. Appx. 246 (first judgment) and 253 (third judgment); 69 Fed. Appx. 657 (second judgment).

851 F.2d 1420 U.S.v.Reyes-Martinez* NO. 87-6005 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JUL 12, 1988 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00268-CR Ex parte Abraham Reyes-Martinez FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-21-0871-A-HC, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION Appellant Abraham Reyes-Martinez appeals the trial court’s order denying his pretrial application for writ of hab

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 4 33 l 'w’ol Abel Acosta, Clerk P.O. Box 12308, Capital Station Austin, Tx. 78711 MAY 8, 2015 RE: Filing Applicant's rebuttal to the State's answer to his application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in cause No. 11-CR:2803-H Dear Clerk, Please file the applicant's rebuttal to the State's answer with his application for Writ of Habeas Corpus so it may be presented to the court. Respectfully, Orlando Reyes TDCJ-ID # 1796916 Mark W. Stiles Unit 3060 F.M. 3514 Beaum

479 F.3d 579 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Joel CASTRO-GAXIOLA, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Reyes Guadalupe Martinez-Ruiz, also known as Ray, also known as Leonardo Garcia-Ruiz, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Armando Rodela-Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-2249. No. 06-22

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 No. 18-1221 44444444444= LUIS FERNANDO MARTINEZ REYES, PETITIONER, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIE

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-18-00236-CV _________________ JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant V. LUIS FERNANDO MARTINEZ REYES, Appellee _______________________________________________________________________

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari as to Daniel G. Bello, Fidel Flores, Jose S. Olivarez, Rudy Martinez-Castillo, Lugardo Vazquez-Hernandez, Angel D. Sanabia-Sanchez, Lino I. Carrillo-Hernandez, and Hector A. Cabrera are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Co

PER CURIAM: The appellant registered for the draft in 1964 and was classified as 1-A, that is, eligible for service in the armed forces. On January 5, 1966, the local draft board mailed to him an order to report for induction on January 17. Martinez received the order on January 10. He appeared at the time and place specified in the

POOLER, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the jury instructions given with respect to Count 21 of the indictment, which charged defendants-appellants Heriberto Martinez, aka Boxer, and Carlos Ortega, aka Silencio, with aiding and abetting a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), using or carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence or possessing a firearm in furtherance of that crime, in connection with the murder of Ma

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants Daniel Fernandez and Jose Betancourt appeal from convictions for conspiring to distribute at least 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), 846. Fernandez, who stands convicted after a jury trial, argues on appeal that (1) the district court erred in denying him a mistrial, (2) the district court’s multiple conspiracy jury charge was erroneous, (3) there was a prejudicia

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.