Cases

PER CURIAM.* Eliseo Duarte-Martinez (Duarte) appeals his conviction and the 41-month sen*623tence imposed following his plea of guilty to knowingly and unlawfully being present in the United States without authorization after conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Duarte argues that the “felony” an

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1057 KATHYA ROXANA DUARTE DE MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,* Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Fed. Appx. 246 (first judgment) and 253 (third judgment); 69 Fed. Appx. 657 (second judgment).

24 F.3d 251NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Pedro MARTINEZ-TINOCO, aka Arturo Morales-Tsintzun,Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appelle

PER CURIAM: On this appeal, three co-conspirators challenge their sentences. Alberto Martinez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to import marijuana. Alberto Duarte and David Kerrick were tried together and each found guilty of one count of conspiracy to import marijuana and one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute the marijuana. All three challenge th

(Reported below: 76 Fed. Appx. 562); (75 Fed. Appx. 940); (78 Fed. Appx. 397); (78 Fed. Appx. 436); (79 Fed. Appx. 627); (79 Fed. Appx. 631); (79 Fed. Appx. 616); (79 Fed. Appx. 621); (79 Fed. Appx. 622); (79 Fed. Appx. 623); (79 Fed. Appx. 624). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

(Reported below: 76 Fed. Appx. 562); (75 Fed. Appx. 940); (78 Fed. Appx. 397); (78 Fed. Appx. 436); (79 Fed. Appx. 627); (79 Fed. Appx. 631); (79 Fed. Appx. 616); (79 Fed. Appx. 621); (79 Fed. Appx. 622); (79 Fed. Appx. 623); (79 Fed. Appx. 624). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari

175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl

172 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi

172 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi

TROTT, Circuit Judge: The question before us is whether the district court properly sanctioned the United States for violating a discovery order by precluding the government from seeking the death penalty against Fernando Alvidrez, Marcel Arevalo, Daniel Bravo, Javier Alvidrez Duarte, Gerardo Jacobo, and Robert Mercado (collectively “Defendants”). The district court’s decision to impose this sanction was based on the gover

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1979 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MICHAEL RAND, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Landya B. McCafferty, U.S. District Judge]

231 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FRANK FERNANDEZ, aka Seal A; aka Sapo; JUAN PEREZ GARCIA, aka Seal B; MARIANO D. MARTINEZ, aka Seal C; aka Chuy; JIMMY SANCHEZ; aka Seal D; aka Smokey; MARCEL AREVALO, aka Seal F; aka Psycho; DANIEL BRAVO, aka Seal G; aka Sporty; ROBERT CERVANTES, aka Seal H; aka Gypsy; ROY GAVALDON, aka Seal I; aka Spider; DAVID GONZALES-CONTRERAS, aka Seal J; aka David Contrera

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1612 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JONATHAN MONSON, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark G. Mastroianni, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 22-1982 23-1112 23-1133 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ANTHONY RIVERA-RIVERA; VICTOR M. HERNÁNDEZ-CARRASQUILLO; JIMMY RÍOS-ALVAREZ, a/k/a Pi, Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

18-2811(L) USA v. Blaszczak 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2020 5 (Argued: June 9, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2022) 6 Docket Nos. 18-2811, 18-2825, 18-2867, 18-2878 7 ___________________________________

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1443 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. STEVEN LESSARD, a/k/a Shawn, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph N. Laplante, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1823 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JASIEL F. CORREIA, II, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1180 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BERNELL BRASHER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1180 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BERNELL BRASHER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the