Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “United States v. Maravilla-Leon”
United States v. Garcia-Moralespublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT DUE TO INVALID DEPORTATION Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Jose Luis Garcia-Morales’ (“Defendant”) October 16, 2015 motion to dismiss his indictment due to invalid deportation. Def. Mot., ECF No. 33. The motion has been fully briefed. Pl. Resp., ECF No. 34; Def. Reply, ECF No. 35. Upon consideration of the movin
United States v. Robertsonpublic domain
568 F.3d 1203 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-3126. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 19, 2009. *1206 Terrence J. Campbell, Barber Emerson, L.C., Lawrence, KS, for Defendant-Appellant. Leon Patton, Assistant United States Attorney (Mar
United States v. Fieldspublic domain
516 F.3d 923 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Leon FIELDS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. State of Oklahoma, Amicus Curiae. No. 05-7128. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 25, 2008. *924 *925 *926 Vicki Mand
Avagyan v. Holderpublic domain
Opinion by Judge B. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN. OPINION B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Elza Avagyan petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) denial as untimely of her motion to reopen removal proceedings to apply for adjustment of status, on account of ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). See De Mart
Lucena v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Jesus Hernandez Lucena and Santa Delia Partida Flores (together, “Petitioners”) petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their motion to reopen in absentia removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.1
Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USApublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT POLLAK, District Judge. On May 7, 2004, an Immigration Judge (IJ) ordered that Soriba Fadiga be removed to Guinea. Fadiga moved to reopen the removal proceedings, Fadiga’s counsel acknowledging that he had provided ineffective assistance in presenting Fa-diga’s application for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration and
Fadiga v. Atty Gen USApublic domain
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-15-2007 Fadiga v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Pre